Non-myeloablative conditioning for second hematopoietic cell transplantation for graft failure in patients with non-malignant disorders: A prospective study and review of the literature

K. Mallhi, P. J. Orchard, W. P. Miller, Q. Cao, J. Tolar, T. C. Lund

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) effectively treats several non-malignant disorders such as selected lysosomal disorders, cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy and hemoglobinopathies. However, rates of graft failure (GF) in non-malignant populations exceed those of patients with malignant indications for HCT. Salvage conditioning regimens and outcomes for second HCT for GF vary immensely in the literature. We report 17 consecutive pediatric patients with non-malignant disorders who underwent a second allogenic HCT for GF using a non-myeloablative, low-dose busulfan-based regimen. Graft sources for the second transplant included umbilical cord blood, unrelated bone marrow and unrelated PBSCs. Median age at time of second HCT was 6.6 years (1.1-14.6 years). Fourteen of seventeen patients (82%) achieved engraftment, with a 3-year overall survival of 82% (95% CI, 54-94%). Day 100 transplant-related mortality was 12% (95% CI, 0-27%). CMV and adenovirus reactivation occurred in 30% and fungal infections in 18%. The incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD disease was 35% (95% CI, 13-58%) with only 6% grade III-IV (95% CI, 0-17%). In summary, we illustrate excellent overall survival and acceptable toxicity using a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen for second HCT as salvage therapy for first GF in patients with non-malignant conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)726-732
Number of pages7
JournalBone marrow transplantation
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Non-myeloablative conditioning for second hematopoietic cell transplantation for graft failure in patients with non-malignant disorders: A prospective study and review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this