Abstract
The optimal prophylactic agent for PCP that is currently available is TMP-SMZ; however, this combination is not tolerated by 34% of HIV-infected patients [2]. AP (300 mg/mo) is a secondline agent as, in comparison with TMP-SMZ, it is less efficacious for prophylaxis of PCP, more costly, and not prophylactic for extrapulmonary pneumocystosis [3, 4]. Our patient developed PCP while he was taking AP (300 mg/mo), and he exhibited intolerance to other accepted prophylactic agents. We empiricallyrestarted treatment with AP at a dose of 600 mg twice per month (quadrupling the usual monthly dose), and this regimen was successful as secondary prophylaxis for our patient for> i year.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 258 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Clinical Infectious Diseases |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1994 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'No gioke intended'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS