No association between plant mating system and geographic range overlap

Dena Grossenbacher, Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist, Emma E. Goldberg, Yaniv Brandvain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Automatic self-fertilization may influence the geography of speciation, promote reproductive isolation between incipient species, and lead to ecological differentiation. As such, selfing taxa are predicted to co-occur more often with their closest relatives than are outcrossing taxa. Despite suggestions that this pattern may be general, the extent to which mating system influences range overlap in close relatives has not been tested formally across a diverse group of plant species pairs. METHODS: We tested for a difference in range overlap between species pairs for which zero, one, or both species are selfers, using data from 98 sister species pairs in 20 genera across 15 flowering plant families. We also used divergence time estimates from time-calibrated phylogenies to ask how range overlap changes with divergence time and whether this effect depends on mating system. KEY RESULTS: We found no evidence that automatic self-fertilization influenced range overlap of closely related plant species. Sister pairs with more recent divergence times had modestly greater range overlap, but this effect did not depend on mating system. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of a strong influence of mating system on range overlap suggests that mating system plays a minor or inconsistent role compared with many other mechanisms potentially influencing the co-occurrence of close relatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)110-117
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of botany
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Age
  • Co-occurrence
  • Geography
  • Mating system
  • Outcrossing
  • Phylogeny
  • Selfing
  • Speciation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'No association between plant mating system and geographic range overlap'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this