NIH consensus development conference statement: Inhaled nitric-oxide therapy for premature infants

F. Sessions Cole, Claudia Alleyne, John D E Barks, Robert J. Boyle, John L. Carroll, Deborah Dokken, William H. Edwards, Michael Georgieff, Katherine Gregory, Michael V. Johnston, Michael Kramer, Christine Mitchell, Josef Neu, DeWayne M. Pursley, Walter M. Robinson, David H. Rowitch

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

169 Scopus citations

Abstract

Premature birth is a major public health problem in the United States and internationally. Infants born at or before 32 weeks' gestation (2% of all births in the United States in 2007) are at extremely high risk for death in the neonatal period or for pulmonary, visual, and neurodevelopmental morbidities with lifelong consequences including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and brain injury. Risks for adverse outcomes increase with decreasing gestational age. The economic costs to care for these infants are also substantial (estimated at $26 billion in 2005 in the United States). It is clear that the need for strategies to improve outcomes for this high-risk population is great, and this need has prompted testing of new therapies with the potential to decrease pulmonary and other complications of prematurity. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) emerged as one such therapy. To provide health care professionals, families, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data regarding the benefits and risks of iNO in premature infants, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Office of Medical Applications of Research of the National Institutes of Health convened a consensus-development conference. Findings from a substantial body of experimental work in developing animals and other model systems suggest that nitric oxide may enhance lung growth and reduce lung inflammation independently of its effects on blood vessel resistance. Although this work demonstrates biological plausibility and the results of randomized controlled trials in term and near-term infants were positive, combined evidence from the 14 randomized controlled trials of iNO treatment in premature infants of ≤34 weeks' gestation shows equivocal effects on pulmonary outcomes, survival, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)363-369
Number of pages7
JournalPediatrics
Volume127
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Keywords

  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  • Inhaled nitric-oxide therapy
  • Premature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'NIH consensus development conference statement: Inhaled nitric-oxide therapy for premature infants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this