Abstract
U.S. Labor Law currently allows employers whose work forces are unionized to introduce new technologies without bargaining over the decision to do so. This forces unions to adopt inefficient strategies when negotiating collective bargaining agreements in an effort to minimize the impact of technological change on their members. Allowing unions to bargain over the decision to introduce new technologies would obviate their having to resort to these inefficient strategies. In addition, it might increase the likelihood of employees suggesting alterations in production processes that would increase the rate of technological change. For these reasons, this article advocates amending U.S. labor law to require employers to bargain over the introduction of new technologies.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 37-48 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1997 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Collective bargaining
- Labor law
- Technological change
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'New technology in unionized firms? Advantages of mandatory bargaining'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS