Neuroeconomics: Formal models of decision making and cognitive neuroscience

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

In economic analysis, decision theory is developed with a purely axiomatic method. The theory proceeds by first defining a set of choices that a subject (the decision-maker, DM) faces. A choice is a finite set of options that are offered to the DM; a decision is the selection of one of these options. The observed data are pairs of choices offered and decisions taken: it is possible to collect these data experimentally asking a real DM to pick one out of two options, under the condition that the object selected is actually delivered to him or her. For neuroeconomics and any research program that tries to determine how decisions are implemented, the utility function is the most interesting object. This function ties observed behavior with a simple one-dimensional quantity, the utility of the option, and predicts that the decision between two options is taken by selecting the option with the highest utility. However, if interested in determining the neural correspondents of the objects one has introduced, one must first know whether these objects are unique. For example, one may formulate the hypothesis that the decision is taken depending on some statistics of the firing rate of a group of neurons associated with each of the options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNeuroeconomics
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages33-46
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9780123741769
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Neuroeconomics: Formal models of decision making and cognitive neuroscience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this