Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) to a phonemic fricative contrast ("s" and "sh") show significant differences in listening conditions with or without a hearing aid and whether the aided condition significantly alters a listener's ERP responses to the fricative speech sounds. DESIGN: The raw EEG data were collected using a 64-channel system from 10 healthy adult subjects with normal hearing. The fricative stimuli were digitally edited versions of naturally produced syllables, /sa/ and /∫a/. The evoked responses were derived in unaided and aided conditions by using an alternating block design with a passive listening task. Peak latencies and amplitudes of the P1-N1-P2 components and the N1' and P2" peaks of the acoustic change complex (ACC) were analyzed. RESULTS: The evoked N1 and N1' responses to the fricative sounds significantly differed in the unaided condition. The fricative contrast also elicited distinct N1-P2 responses in the aided condition. While the aided condition increased and delayed the N1 and ACC responses, significant differences in the P1-N1-P2 and ACC components were still observed, which would support fricative contrast perception at the cortical level. CONCLUSION: Despite significant alterations in the ERP responses by the aided condition, normal-hearing adult listeners showed distinct neural coding patterns for the voiceless fricative contrast, "s" and "sh," with or without a hearing aid.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e122-e133 |
| Journal | Ear and hearing |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Acoustic change complex
- Event-related potential
- Fricative
- Hearing aid
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Neural coding of phonemic fricative contrast with and without hearing aid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS