Neonicotinoid insecticide hydrolysis and photolysis: Rates and residual toxicity

Stephen A. Todey, Ann M. Fallon, William A. Arnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Neonicotinoid insecticides are the most widely used class of insecticides worldwide. Concern has grown over their widespread environmental presence and potential unintended adverse effects. The present study examined hydrolysis and photolysis reaction rates of neonicotinoids and assessed any residual toxicity of reaction products. Hydrolysis rates were tested between pH 4 and 10 and found to be base-catalyzed. Experiments revealed a nonelementary rate law for hydrolysis, with the hydroxide concentration raised to a power of 0.55 ± 0.09, which has implications for accurate prediction of environmental half-lives. Divalent metal ions (Cu 2+ , Ni 2+ , Zn 2+ ) and minerals (kaolinite, goethite, TiO 2 ) had no effect on hydrolysis rates. The hydrolysis rate in a natural water, however, was slower than that predicted by buffered experiments. Nitenpyram, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and clothianidin reacted via direct photolysis in both ultrapure and natural waters, with average quantum yields of 0.024 ± 0.001, 0.0105 ± 0.0002, 0.0140 ± 0.0002, and 0.0101 ± 0.0001, respectively. Acetamiprid primarily underwent indirect photolysis by reaction with OH· (1.7 ± [0.2] × 10 9 M −1 s −1 ). For all compounds, the urea derivative was the most commonly detected product in both hydrolysis and photolysis experiments. Using mosquito (Culex pipiens) larvae, no residual toxicity of reaction products was observed. Results indicate long environmental half-lives for the tested neonicotinoids, which may help to explain their ubiquitous presence in environmental matrices. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2797–2809.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2797-2809
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Supplemental Data—The Supplemental Data are available on the Wiley Online Library at DOI:10.1002/etc.4256 Acknowledgement—The present study was funded by the Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative and Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources. We thank J. Kirk for assistance in the laboratory, the staff at the University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center for their help with the product identification, and I. Engan for her work on preliminary experiments. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Keywords

  • Abiotic transformation
  • Contaminants
  • Environmental fate
  • Insecticide
  • Neonicotinoids

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Neonicotinoid insecticide hydrolysis and photolysis: Rates and residual toxicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this