Neoliberal contradictions in two private niches of educational ‘choice’

Marguerite Anne Fillion Wilson, Burke Scarbrough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article brings together ethnographies of two privileged educational settings in the United States–a private school in California’s Central Valley following the progressivist Sudbury model, and an affluent New England boarding school’s summer enrichment program. Each of these institutions serves as an alternative to and/or extension of publicly accessible education institutions during a neoliberal era of marketization and growing educational inequality. By comparing findings from ethnographic studies of each institution, we find that both celebrate open access and socially responsible pedagogical values in ways that obscure mechanisms of exclusion and an entrenched individualist ideology. We discuss two particular contradictions that manifest in both settings: first, a discourse of openness and inclusivity that belies the ways in which access is mediated by constructions of who best ‘fits’ the special learning community; and second, an outspoken allegiance to socially engaged values of diversity and democracy that belies the ways in which these values are commodified and appropriated for students’ individual advantage(s). In comparing such sites, we argue for the importance of tracing the mechanisms of advantage in under-researched ‘niches’ of the dynamically shifting and unequally accessed neoliberal marketplace for educational opportunity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-92
Number of pages19
JournalCritical Studies in Education
Volume59
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

Fingerprint

boarding school
Values
educational inequality
private school
educational opportunity
educational setting
open access
ethnography
exclusion
ideology
democracy
discourse
learning
community
education
student

Keywords

  • Discourse
  • educational disparities
  • ethnography
  • neoliberalism
  • privilege
  • school choice
  • studying up

Cite this

Neoliberal contradictions in two private niches of educational ‘choice’. / Wilson, Marguerite Anne Fillion; Scarbrough, Burke.

In: Critical Studies in Education, Vol. 59, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 74-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09e56449a1b5479fbc34b5a8ce0b6063,
title = "Neoliberal contradictions in two private niches of educational ‘choice’",
abstract = "This article brings together ethnographies of two privileged educational settings in the United States–a private school in California’s Central Valley following the progressivist Sudbury model, and an affluent New England boarding school’s summer enrichment program. Each of these institutions serves as an alternative to and/or extension of publicly accessible education institutions during a neoliberal era of marketization and growing educational inequality. By comparing findings from ethnographic studies of each institution, we find that both celebrate open access and socially responsible pedagogical values in ways that obscure mechanisms of exclusion and an entrenched individualist ideology. We discuss two particular contradictions that manifest in both settings: first, a discourse of openness and inclusivity that belies the ways in which access is mediated by constructions of who best ‘fits’ the special learning community; and second, an outspoken allegiance to socially engaged values of diversity and democracy that belies the ways in which these values are commodified and appropriated for students’ individual advantage(s). In comparing such sites, we argue for the importance of tracing the mechanisms of advantage in under-researched ‘niches’ of the dynamically shifting and unequally accessed neoliberal marketplace for educational opportunity.",
keywords = "Discourse, educational disparities, ethnography, neoliberalism, privilege, school choice, studying up",
author = "Wilson, {Marguerite Anne Fillion} and Burke Scarbrough",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/17508487.2016.1167756",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "74--92",
journal = "Critical Studies in Education",
issn = "1750-8487",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neoliberal contradictions in two private niches of educational ‘choice’

AU - Wilson, Marguerite Anne Fillion

AU - Scarbrough, Burke

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - This article brings together ethnographies of two privileged educational settings in the United States–a private school in California’s Central Valley following the progressivist Sudbury model, and an affluent New England boarding school’s summer enrichment program. Each of these institutions serves as an alternative to and/or extension of publicly accessible education institutions during a neoliberal era of marketization and growing educational inequality. By comparing findings from ethnographic studies of each institution, we find that both celebrate open access and socially responsible pedagogical values in ways that obscure mechanisms of exclusion and an entrenched individualist ideology. We discuss two particular contradictions that manifest in both settings: first, a discourse of openness and inclusivity that belies the ways in which access is mediated by constructions of who best ‘fits’ the special learning community; and second, an outspoken allegiance to socially engaged values of diversity and democracy that belies the ways in which these values are commodified and appropriated for students’ individual advantage(s). In comparing such sites, we argue for the importance of tracing the mechanisms of advantage in under-researched ‘niches’ of the dynamically shifting and unequally accessed neoliberal marketplace for educational opportunity.

AB - This article brings together ethnographies of two privileged educational settings in the United States–a private school in California’s Central Valley following the progressivist Sudbury model, and an affluent New England boarding school’s summer enrichment program. Each of these institutions serves as an alternative to and/or extension of publicly accessible education institutions during a neoliberal era of marketization and growing educational inequality. By comparing findings from ethnographic studies of each institution, we find that both celebrate open access and socially responsible pedagogical values in ways that obscure mechanisms of exclusion and an entrenched individualist ideology. We discuss two particular contradictions that manifest in both settings: first, a discourse of openness and inclusivity that belies the ways in which access is mediated by constructions of who best ‘fits’ the special learning community; and second, an outspoken allegiance to socially engaged values of diversity and democracy that belies the ways in which these values are commodified and appropriated for students’ individual advantage(s). In comparing such sites, we argue for the importance of tracing the mechanisms of advantage in under-researched ‘niches’ of the dynamically shifting and unequally accessed neoliberal marketplace for educational opportunity.

KW - Discourse

KW - educational disparities

KW - ethnography

KW - neoliberalism

KW - privilege

KW - school choice

KW - studying up

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962345193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962345193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17508487.2016.1167756

DO - 10.1080/17508487.2016.1167756

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 74

EP - 92

JO - Critical Studies in Education

JF - Critical Studies in Education

SN - 1750-8487

IS - 1

ER -