TY - JOUR
T1 - Natural climate solutions
AU - Griscom, Bronson W.
AU - Adams, Justin
AU - Ellis, Peter W.
AU - Houghton, Richard A.
AU - Lomax, Guy
AU - Miteva, Daniela A.
AU - Schlesinger, William H.
AU - Shoch, David
AU - Siikamäki, Juha V.
AU - Smith, Pete
AU - Woodbury, Peter
AU - Zganjar, Chris
AU - Blackman, Allen
AU - Campari, João
AU - Conant, Richard T.
AU - Delgado, Christopher
AU - Elias, Patricia
AU - Gopalakrishna, Trisha
AU - Hamsik, Marisa R.
AU - Herrero, Mario
AU - Kiesecker, Joseph
AU - Landis, Emily
AU - Laestadius, Lars
AU - Leavitt, Sara M.
AU - Minnemeyer, Susan
AU - Polasky, Stephen
AU - Potapov, Peter
AU - Putz, Francis E.
AU - Sanderman, Jonathan
AU - Silvius, Marcel
AU - Wollenberg, Eva
AU - Fargione, Joseph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/10/31
Y1 - 2017/10/31
N2 - Better stewardship of land is needed to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of holding warming to below 2 °C; however, confusion persists about the specific set of land stewardship options available and their mitigation potential. To address this, we identify and quantify “natural climate solutions” (NCS): 20 conservation, restoration, and improved land management actions that increase carbon storage and/or avoid greenhouse gas emissions across global forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands. We find that the maximum potential of NCS—when constrained by food security, fiber security, and biodiversity conservation—is 23.8 petagrams of CO2 equivalent (PgCO2e) y−1 (95% CI 20.3–37.4). This is ≥30% higher than prior estimates, which did not include the full range of options and safeguards considered here. About half of this maximum (11.3 PgCO2e y−1) represents cost-effective climate mitigation, assuming the social cost of CO2 pollution is ≥100 USD MgCO2e−1 by 2030. Natural climate solutions can provide 37% of cost-effective CO2 mitigation needed through 2030 for a >66% chance of holding warming to below 2 °C. One-third of this cost-effective NCS mitigation can be delivered at or below 10 USD MgCO2−1. Most NCS actions—if effectively implemented—also offer water filtration, flood buffering, soil health, biodiversity habitat, and enhanced climate resilience. Work remains to better constrain uncertainty of NCS mitigation estimates. Nevertheless, existing knowledge reported here provides a robust basis for immediate global action to improve ecosystem stewardship as a major solution to climate change.
AB - Better stewardship of land is needed to achieve the Paris Climate Agreement goal of holding warming to below 2 °C; however, confusion persists about the specific set of land stewardship options available and their mitigation potential. To address this, we identify and quantify “natural climate solutions” (NCS): 20 conservation, restoration, and improved land management actions that increase carbon storage and/or avoid greenhouse gas emissions across global forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands. We find that the maximum potential of NCS—when constrained by food security, fiber security, and biodiversity conservation—is 23.8 petagrams of CO2 equivalent (PgCO2e) y−1 (95% CI 20.3–37.4). This is ≥30% higher than prior estimates, which did not include the full range of options and safeguards considered here. About half of this maximum (11.3 PgCO2e y−1) represents cost-effective climate mitigation, assuming the social cost of CO2 pollution is ≥100 USD MgCO2e−1 by 2030. Natural climate solutions can provide 37% of cost-effective CO2 mitigation needed through 2030 for a >66% chance of holding warming to below 2 °C. One-third of this cost-effective NCS mitigation can be delivered at or below 10 USD MgCO2−1. Most NCS actions—if effectively implemented—also offer water filtration, flood buffering, soil health, biodiversity habitat, and enhanced climate resilience. Work remains to better constrain uncertainty of NCS mitigation estimates. Nevertheless, existing knowledge reported here provides a robust basis for immediate global action to improve ecosystem stewardship as a major solution to climate change.
KW - Agriculture
KW - Climate mitigation
KW - Ecosystems
KW - Forests
KW - Wetlands
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032656201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032656201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1710465114
DO - 10.1073/pnas.1710465114
M3 - Article
C2 - 29078344
AN - SCOPUS:85032656201
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 114
SP - 11645
EP - 11650
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 44
ER -