TY - JOUR
T1 - MyoD induces myogenic differentiation through cooperation of its NH 2- and COOH-terminal regions
AU - Ishibashi, Jeff
AU - Perry, Robert L.
AU - Asakura, Atsushi
AU - Rudnicki, Michael A.
PY - 2005/11/7
Y1 - 2005/11/7
N2 - MyoD and Myf5 are basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that play key but redundant roles in specifying myogenic progenitors during embryogenesis. However, there are functional differences between the two transcription factors that impact myoblast proliferation and differentiation. Target gene activation could be one such difference. We have used microarray and polymerase chain reaction approaches to measure the induction of muscle gene expression by MyoD and Myf5 in an in vitro model. In proliferating cells, MyoD and Myf5 function very similarly to activate the expression of likely growth phase target genes such as L-myc, m-cadherin, Mcpt8, Runx1, Spp1, Six1, IGFBP5, and Chrnβ1. MyoD, however, is strikingly more effective than Myf5 at inducing differentiation-phase target genes. This distinction between MyoD and Myf5 results from a novel and unanticipated cooperation between the MyoD NH 2- and COOH-terminal regions. Together, these results support the notion that Myf5 functions toward myoblast proliferation, whereas MyoD prepares myoblasts for efficient differentiation.
AB - MyoD and Myf5 are basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that play key but redundant roles in specifying myogenic progenitors during embryogenesis. However, there are functional differences between the two transcription factors that impact myoblast proliferation and differentiation. Target gene activation could be one such difference. We have used microarray and polymerase chain reaction approaches to measure the induction of muscle gene expression by MyoD and Myf5 in an in vitro model. In proliferating cells, MyoD and Myf5 function very similarly to activate the expression of likely growth phase target genes such as L-myc, m-cadherin, Mcpt8, Runx1, Spp1, Six1, IGFBP5, and Chrnβ1. MyoD, however, is strikingly more effective than Myf5 at inducing differentiation-phase target genes. This distinction between MyoD and Myf5 results from a novel and unanticipated cooperation between the MyoD NH 2- and COOH-terminal regions. Together, these results support the notion that Myf5 functions toward myoblast proliferation, whereas MyoD prepares myoblasts for efficient differentiation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27744475372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27744475372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1083/jcb.200502101
DO - 10.1083/jcb.200502101
M3 - Article
C2 - 16275751
AN - SCOPUS:27744475372
SN - 0021-9525
VL - 171
SP - 471
EP - 482
JO - Journal of Cell Biology
JF - Journal of Cell Biology
IS - 3
ER -