Muscimol, γ-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors and excitatory amino acids in the mouse spinal cord

L. M. Aanonsen, G. L. Wilcox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

These experiments examined the effects of intrathecally administered γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonists on the effects of intrathecally administered excitatory amino acid (EAA) agonists: N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA), quisqualic acid and kainic acid. We have found that muscimol, a GABA(A) receptor agonist, but not baclofen, a GABA(B) receptor agonist, dose-dependently inhibited caudally directed biting and scratching behavior induced by all three EAA agonists. This nonselective blockade of the expression of effects mediated by all three types of EAA receptor is in marked contrast to the selective blockade of NMDA effects seen previously in the case of mu opioids and phencyclidine receptor agonists. Inhibition by muscimol was blocked with the GABA(A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline. Decreased latency or hyperalgesia in the tail-flick test, found previously to be induced selectively by NMDA and blocked by an NMDA receptor antagonist, was similarly affected by muscimol but not baclofen, each given intrathecally. However, muscimol prolonged the tail-flick latency only after presentation of NMDA suggesting a possible antinociceptive effect of GABA(A) agonists in the presence of agonists at NMDA receptors. This study together with the preceding paper resolves GABA-mediated spinal antinociception into two components; a GABA(A) agonist selectively blocks nociception involving EAA receptors where as a GABA(B) agonist selectively blocks substance P spinal activity (the preceding paper).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1034-1038
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Volume248
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Muscimol, γ-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors and excitatory amino acids in the mouse spinal cord'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this