Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Muon-pair and tau-pair production in two-photon collisions at LEP

  • P. Achard
  • , O. Adriani
  • , M. Aguilar-Benitez
  • , J. Alcaraz
  • , G. Alemanni
  • , J. Allaby
  • , A. Aloisio
  • , M. G. Alviggi
  • , H. Anderhub
  • , V. P. Andreev
  • , F. Anselmo
  • , A. Arefiev
  • , T. Azemoon
  • , T. Aziz
  • , P. Bagnaia
  • , A. Bajo
  • , G. Baksay
  • , L. Baksay
  • , S. V. Baldew
  • , S. Banerjee
  • Sw Banerjee, A. Barczyk, R. Barillère, P. Bartalini, M. Basile, N. Batalova, R. Battiston, A. Bay, F. Becattini, U. Becker, F. Behner, L. Bellucci, R. Berbeco, J. Berdugo, P. Berges, B. Bertucci, B. L. Betev, M. Biasini, M. Biglietti, A. Biland, J. J. Blaising, S. C. Blyth, G. J. Bobbink, A. Böhm, L. Boldizsar, B. Borgia, S. Bottai, D. Bourilkov, M. Bourquin, J. Mans, L3 Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The QED processes e+e- → e+e-μ+μ- and e+e- → e+e-τ+τ- are studied with the L3 detector at LEP using an untagged data sample collected at centre-of-mass energies 161 GeV ≤ √s ≤ 209 GeV. The τ-pairs are observed through the associated decay of one τ into eνν and the other into ππν. The cross sections are measured as a function of √s. For muon pairs, the cross section of the γγ → μ+μ- process is also measured as a function of the two-photon centre-of-mass energy for 3 GeV ≤ Wγγ ≤ 40 GeV. Good agreement is found between these measurements and the O(α4) QED expectations. In addition, limits on the anomalous magnetic and electric dipole moments of the τ lepton are extracted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-62
Number of pages10
JournalPhysics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics
Volume585
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 8 2004

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Muon-pair and tau-pair production in two-photon collisions at LEP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this