TY - GEN
T1 - Multiple query optimization with depth-first branch-and-bound and dynamic query ordering
AU - Cosar, Ahmet
AU - Lim, Ee Peng
AU - Srivastava, Jaideep
PY - 1993
Y1 - 1993
N2 - In certain database applications such as deductive databases, batch query processing, and recursive query processing etc., a single query can be transformed into a set of closely related database queries. Great benefits can be obtained by executing a group of related queries all together in a single unified multi-plan instead of executing each query separately. In order to achieve this, Multiple Query Optimization (MQO) identifies common task(s) (e.g. common subexpressions, joins, etc.) among a set of query plans and creates a single unified plan (multiplan) which can be executed to obtain the required outputs for all queries at once. In this paper, a new heuristic function (fc), dynamic query ordering heuristics, and Depth-First Branch-and-Bound (DFBB) are defined and experimentally evaluated, and compared with existing methods which use A* and static query ordering. Our experiments show that all three of fc, DFBB, and dynamic query ordering help to improve the performance of our MQO algorithm.
AB - In certain database applications such as deductive databases, batch query processing, and recursive query processing etc., a single query can be transformed into a set of closely related database queries. Great benefits can be obtained by executing a group of related queries all together in a single unified multi-plan instead of executing each query separately. In order to achieve this, Multiple Query Optimization (MQO) identifies common task(s) (e.g. common subexpressions, joins, etc.) among a set of query plans and creates a single unified plan (multiplan) which can be executed to obtain the required outputs for all queries at once. In this paper, a new heuristic function (fc), dynamic query ordering heuristics, and Depth-First Branch-and-Bound (DFBB) are defined and experimentally evaluated, and compared with existing methods which use A* and static query ordering. Our experiments show that all three of fc, DFBB, and dynamic query ordering help to improve the performance of our MQO algorithm.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027866029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027866029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/170088.170181
DO - 10.1145/170088.170181
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:0027866029
SN - 0897916263
SN - 9780897916264
T3 - Proc 2 Int Conf Inf Knowl Manage
SP - 433
EP - 438
BT - Proc 2 Int Conf Inf Knowl Manage
PB - Publ by ACM
T2 - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
Y2 - 1 November 1993 through 5 November 1993
ER -