Multimodal prehabilitation program valuation for thoracic surgical patients

Maxamillian Solow, Tjorvi E. Perry

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of reviewModifiable patient-related risk factors, such as physical, emotional, and cognitive frailty, poor nutritional status, sleep hygiene, anemia, alcohol abuse, and smoking reduce a patient's ability to effectively recover from the insult of surgery. Herein, we review the value of implementing a comprehensive prehabilitation program for patients undergoing thoracic surgery.Recent findingsAlthough prehabilitation is not a novel concept, recent evidence suggest that 4-6 weeks of prehabilitation prior to surgery is likely to increase a patient's preoperative functional status allowing patients to return to independence earlier after surgery. The value of a prehabilitation program can be determined using cost effectiveness analysis, cost-benefit analysis (CBA), cost-utility analysis (CUA), and cost-consequence analysis (CCA).SummaryIt stands to reason that well designed prehabilitation programs can add value by improving quality metrics at a lower cost to our healthcare system. Definitive randomized trials are needed to confirm this notion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-67
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent opinion in anaesthesiology
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • prehabilitation
  • program valuation
  • thoracic surgery

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Review
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multimodal prehabilitation program valuation for thoracic surgical patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this