TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-outcome meta-analysis (MOMA) of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia
T2 - Revisiting the relevance of human coaching and elucidating interplay between multiple outcomes
AU - Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Lana
AU - Betz, Linda T.
AU - Dominke, Clara
AU - Haas, Shalaila S.
AU - Subramaniam, Karuna
AU - Fisher, Melisa
AU - Vinogradov, Sophia
AU - Koutsouleris, Nikolaos
AU - Kambeitz, Joseph
N1 - Funding Information:
Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic was supported by the EU-FP7 project PRONIA (“Personalised Prognostic Tools for Early Psychosis Management”) under the Grant Agreement No° 602152 . Appendix A
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Cognitive remediation (CR) is nowadays mainly administered in a computerized fashion, yet frequently supplemented by human guidance. The effects of CR on cognitive, functional and clinical outcomes are consistently reported, yet the response is heterogeneous. In order to resolve this heterogeneity, we employed a multi-outcome meta-analytic approach, examined effects of CR on each outcome category separately and estimated directed effects between three outcome categories. We extracted treatment effects from 67 studies that trained patients with schizophrenia (total n = 4067) using either 1) computerized CR modality alone or 2) in combination with supplementary human guidance (SHG). All three outcome domains were significantly improved by CR with small to moderate effect sizes when assessing outcomes across all studies. The comparison between CR administered with SHG revealed largest effects on the cognitive subdomains of working and verbal memory. Structural equation modeling in the single-study data suggests that cognitive gains trigger restoration of psychosocial functioning which in turn facilitates improvement in clinical symptoms.
AB - Cognitive remediation (CR) is nowadays mainly administered in a computerized fashion, yet frequently supplemented by human guidance. The effects of CR on cognitive, functional and clinical outcomes are consistently reported, yet the response is heterogeneous. In order to resolve this heterogeneity, we employed a multi-outcome meta-analytic approach, examined effects of CR on each outcome category separately and estimated directed effects between three outcome categories. We extracted treatment effects from 67 studies that trained patients with schizophrenia (total n = 4067) using either 1) computerized CR modality alone or 2) in combination with supplementary human guidance (SHG). All three outcome domains were significantly improved by CR with small to moderate effect sizes when assessing outcomes across all studies. The comparison between CR administered with SHG revealed largest effects on the cognitive subdomains of working and verbal memory. Structural equation modeling in the single-study data suggests that cognitive gains trigger restoration of psychosocial functioning which in turn facilitates improvement in clinical symptoms.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074266530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074266530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.031
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.031
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31557548
AN - SCOPUS:85074266530
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 107
SP - 828
EP - 845
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
ER -