TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-institutional evaluation of MVCT guided patient registration and dosimetric precision in total marrow irradiation
T2 - A global health initiative by the international consortium of total marrow irradiation
AU - Zuro, Darren
AU - Vagge, Stefano
AU - Broggi, Sara
AU - Agostinelli, Stefano
AU - Takahashi, Yutaka
AU - Brooks, Jamison
AU - Leszcynska, Paulina
AU - Liu, An
AU - Zucchetti, Claudio
AU - Saldi, Simonetta
AU - Han, Chunhui
AU - Cattaneo, Mauro
AU - Giebel, Sebastian
AU - Mahe, Marc Andre
AU - Sanchez, James F.
AU - Alaei, Parham
AU - Anna, Chiara
AU - Dusenbery, Kathryn
AU - Pierini, Antonio
AU - Storme, Guy
AU - Aristei, Cynthia
AU - Wong, Jeffrey Y.C.
AU - Hui, Susanta
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health grants 1R01CA154491-01 and partially supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30CA033572 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors wish to thank Roberto Tarducci, Martina Iacco, and Krzystof Slosarek for valuable discussions and support for this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Purpose: Total marrow irradiation (TMI) is a highly conformal treatment of the human skeleton structure requiring a high degree of precision and accuracy for treatment delivery. Although many centers worldwide initiated clinical studies using TMI, currently there is no standard for pretreatment patient setup. To this end, the accuracy of different patient setups was measured using pretreatment imaging. Their impact on dose delivery was assessed for multiple institutions. Methods and materials: Whole body imaging (WBI) or partial body imaging (PBI) was performed using pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) in a helical Tomotherapy machine. Rigid registration of MVCT and planning kilovoltage computed tomography images were performed to measure setup error and its effect on dose distribution. The entire skeleton was considered the planning target volume (PTV) with five sub regions: head/neck (HN), spine, shoulder and clavicle (SC), and one avoidance structure, the lungs. Sixty-eight total patients (>300 images) across six institutions were analyzed. Results: Patient setup techniques differed between centers, creating variations in dose delivery. Registration accuracy varied by anatomical region and by imaging technique, with the lowest to the highest degree of pretreatment rigid shifts in the following order: spine, pelvis, HN, SC, and lungs. Mean fractional dose was affected in regions of high registration mismatch, in particular the lungs. Conclusions: MVCT imaging and whole body patient immobilization was essential for assessing treatment setup, allowing for the complete analysis of 3D dose distribution in the PTV and lungs (or avoidance structures).
AB - Purpose: Total marrow irradiation (TMI) is a highly conformal treatment of the human skeleton structure requiring a high degree of precision and accuracy for treatment delivery. Although many centers worldwide initiated clinical studies using TMI, currently there is no standard for pretreatment patient setup. To this end, the accuracy of different patient setups was measured using pretreatment imaging. Their impact on dose delivery was assessed for multiple institutions. Methods and materials: Whole body imaging (WBI) or partial body imaging (PBI) was performed using pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) in a helical Tomotherapy machine. Rigid registration of MVCT and planning kilovoltage computed tomography images were performed to measure setup error and its effect on dose distribution. The entire skeleton was considered the planning target volume (PTV) with five sub regions: head/neck (HN), spine, shoulder and clavicle (SC), and one avoidance structure, the lungs. Sixty-eight total patients (>300 images) across six institutions were analyzed. Results: Patient setup techniques differed between centers, creating variations in dose delivery. Registration accuracy varied by anatomical region and by imaging technique, with the lowest to the highest degree of pretreatment rigid shifts in the following order: spine, pelvis, HN, SC, and lungs. Mean fractional dose was affected in regions of high registration mismatch, in particular the lungs. Conclusions: MVCT imaging and whole body patient immobilization was essential for assessing treatment setup, allowing for the complete analysis of 3D dose distribution in the PTV and lungs (or avoidance structures).
KW - MVCT
KW - TMI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070546472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070546472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 31421913
AN - SCOPUS:85070546472
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 141
SP - 275
EP - 282
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
ER -