Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: Survey of United States transplant centers

Arthur J. Matas, Stephen T. Bartlett, Alan B. Leichtman, Francis L. Delmonico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

296 Scopus citations

Abstract

There have been two recent trends in living kidney donation: increased acceptance of living donors and increased acceptance of laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN). We surveyed 234 UNOS-listed kidney transplant programs to determine current living donor morbidity and mortality for open nephrectomy, hand-assisted LN, and non-hand-assisted LN. Of the 234 centers, 171 (73%) responded. Between 1/1/1999 and 7/1/2001, these centers carried out 10828 living donor nephrectomies: 52.3% open, 20.7% hand-assisted LN, and 27% non-hand-assisted LN. Two donors (0.02%) died from surgical complications and one is in a persistent vegetative state (all after LN). Reoperation was necessary in 22 (0.4%) open, 23 (1.0%) hand-assisted LN, and 21 (0.9%) non-hand-assisted LN cases (p=0.001). Complications not requiring reoperation were reported for 19 (0.3%) open, 22 (1.0%) hand-assisted LN, and 24 (0.8%) non-hand-assisted LN cases (p=0.02). Readmission rate was higher for LN (1.6%) vs. open (0.6%) donors (p < 0.001), almost entirely as a result of an increase in gastrointestinal complications in LN donors. Morbidity and mortality for living donor nephrectomy at transplant centers in the United States remain low. We provide current data from which comprehensive informed consent can be obtained from donors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)830-834
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume3
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2003

Keywords

  • Kidney donor
  • Morbidity
  • Mortality

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: Survey of United States transplant centers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this