Moral typecasting underlies punitive responses to crime

Andrea L. Miller, Eugene Borgida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examine the role of moral typecasting in lay individuals' punitive responses to crime. Individuals perceive criminal offenders and victims in ways that are biased by their perceptions of the actors' moral roles in prior simulated criminal incidents. We find that this psychological process of moral typecasting has important implications for punitive responses to criminal offenders, and these findings make 2 major contributions to the literature. First, we show that moral agency is distinct from moral deservingness, which is 1 of the dominant explanations for punitive behavior in social psychology. Second, the role of moral typecasting in punitive responses means that these responses can occur regardless of the valence of moral character. We argue that theories of lay punitive responding that do not take moral typecasting processes into account are incomplete.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)697-706
Number of pages10
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Keywords

  • crime
  • moral character
  • moral desert
  • moral typecasting
  • punitive responses

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Moral typecasting underlies punitive responses to crime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this