Abstract
This study compares estimates of health insurance coverage from the American Community Survey (ACS) to those in twelve state-specific surveys. Uninsurance estimates for the nonelderly are consistently higher in the ACS than in state surveys, as are direct purchase insurance estimates. Estimates for employer-sponsored insurance are similar, but public coverage rates are lower in the ACS. The ACS meets some but not all of the states' data needs; its large sample size and inclusion of all U.S. counties in the sample allow for comparison of insurance coverage within and across states. State-specific surveys provide the flexibility to add policy-relevant questions, including questions needed to examine how health insurance translates into access, use, and affordability of health services.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-105 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Inquiry (United States) |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- American community survey
- Policy evaluation
- State surveys
- Uninsurance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring health reform efforts: Which state-level data to use?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS