Monitoring compliance with BMPs: The experience of state forestry agencies

Paul V Ellefson, Mike Kilgore, M. J. Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Thirty-four states implement compliance monitoring programs to determine whether voluntary or mandatory forest practices are being applied by landowners and timber harvesters in only 20 states does the lead forestry agency have sole responsibility for monitoring. Since the early 1990s, some states have completed five or more monitoring survey cycles, the most recent costing an average of $60,000. Effectiveness of compliance monitoring is enhanced by positive landowners and harvesters attitudes, assignment of monitoring responsibility of a single agency, credible monitoring processes and sufficient resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Forestry
Volume99
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Keywords

  • Best management practices
  • Nonindustrial private forestry
  • Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring compliance with BMPs: The experience of state forestry agencies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this