Moderators' summary: Perceived performance differences. Limb salvage versus amputation in the lower extremity (session II)

Romney C. Andersen, Marc F. Swiontkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Severe extremity trauma is a significant cause of morbidity and disability; these injuries are often considered for amputation. Two studies have shown few differences between amputation and limb salvage outcomes. Functional limitations that result from loss of muscle needed to cover bone and provide limb function are a major factor in the decision to amputate a salvaged limb. Several studies have reported successful management of muscle loss with soft-tissue transfer. Extracellular matrix scaffolds and muscle regeneration using stem cells are promising technologies. However, no single strategy has proved to be effective in the management of limb pain following extremity trauma; a multimodal approach is required for best results. Additional knowledge gaps exist, such as the effect of occupational and physical therapy on the outcome of severe limb injury, factors such as peer visitation and social support networks, and the effect of sex, cultural differences, and patient personality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S20-S22
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Volume19
Issue numberSUPPL.1
StatePublished - Feb 28 2011

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Moderators' summary: Perceived performance differences. Limb salvage versus amputation in the lower extremity (session II)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this