Moderating the Fediverse: Content Moderation on Distributed Social Media

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Current approaches to content moderation generally assume the continued dominance of “walled gardens”: social-media platforms that control who can use their services and how. Whether the discussion is about self-regulation, quasi-public regulation (e.g., Facebook’s Oversight Board), government regulation, tort law (including changes to Section 230), or antitrust enforcement, the assumption is that the future of social media will remain a matter of incrementally reforming a small group of giant, closed platforms. But, viewed from the perspective of the broader history of the internet, the dominance of closed platforms is an aberration. The internet initially grew around a set of open, decentralized applications, many of which remain central to its functioning today.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMedia and Society after Technological Disruption
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages177-192
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781009174411
ISBN (Print)9781009174428
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024.

Keywords

  • Content moderation
  • First Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Mastodon
  • Social media

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moderating the Fediverse: Content Moderation on Distributed Social Media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this