Models of relating - Not relationship models: Cognitive representations of relating across interpersonal relationship domains

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

Two studies apply Fiske's Relational Model Theory (RMT) to interpersonal relationships and indicate that rather than being models of relationships, relational models are models of relating that are used differently across interpersonal relationship domains. Study 1 (n = 145) investigated the use of relational models in three relationship types (mother, friend, and acquaintance). Results showed that even though relationship type predicted relational model use, model use varied significantly across relationship domains. Study 2 (n = 282) provides a cross-cultural replication of these findings (US and Singapore). Results of both studies suggest that Relational Model Theory is a particularly fruitful approach to relationship research when individual relationship domains are considered in addition to relationship types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)629-653
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Social and Personal Relationships
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

model
Singapore
model theory
mother
representation
individual
research

Keywords

  • Intercultural interaction
  • Interpersonal relationships
  • Relational model theory
  • Relationship domain
  • Relationship grammar
  • Relationship model
  • Relationship schema

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{48f757ddea3a4a91915384f11c72bc3b,
title = "Models of relating - Not relationship models: Cognitive representations of relating across interpersonal relationship domains",
abstract = "Two studies apply Fiske's Relational Model Theory (RMT) to interpersonal relationships and indicate that rather than being models of relationships, relational models are models of relating that are used differently across interpersonal relationship domains. Study 1 (n = 145) investigated the use of relational models in three relationship types (mother, friend, and acquaintance). Results showed that even though relationship type predicted relational model use, model use varied significantly across relationship domains. Study 2 (n = 282) provides a cross-cultural replication of these findings (US and Singapore). Results of both studies suggest that Relational Model Theory is a particularly fruitful approach to relationship research when individual relationship domains are considered in addition to relationship types.",
keywords = "Intercultural interaction, Interpersonal relationships, Relational model theory, Relationship domain, Relationship grammar, Relationship model, Relationship schema",
author = "Koerner, {Ascan F.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0265407506065989",
volume = "23",
pages = "629--653",
journal = "Journal of Social and Personal Relationships",
issn = "0265-4075",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Models of relating - Not relationship models

T2 - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

AU - Koerner,Ascan F.

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Two studies apply Fiske's Relational Model Theory (RMT) to interpersonal relationships and indicate that rather than being models of relationships, relational models are models of relating that are used differently across interpersonal relationship domains. Study 1 (n = 145) investigated the use of relational models in three relationship types (mother, friend, and acquaintance). Results showed that even though relationship type predicted relational model use, model use varied significantly across relationship domains. Study 2 (n = 282) provides a cross-cultural replication of these findings (US and Singapore). Results of both studies suggest that Relational Model Theory is a particularly fruitful approach to relationship research when individual relationship domains are considered in addition to relationship types.

AB - Two studies apply Fiske's Relational Model Theory (RMT) to interpersonal relationships and indicate that rather than being models of relationships, relational models are models of relating that are used differently across interpersonal relationship domains. Study 1 (n = 145) investigated the use of relational models in three relationship types (mother, friend, and acquaintance). Results showed that even though relationship type predicted relational model use, model use varied significantly across relationship domains. Study 2 (n = 282) provides a cross-cultural replication of these findings (US and Singapore). Results of both studies suggest that Relational Model Theory is a particularly fruitful approach to relationship research when individual relationship domains are considered in addition to relationship types.

KW - Intercultural interaction

KW - Interpersonal relationships

KW - Relational model theory

KW - Relationship domain

KW - Relationship grammar

KW - Relationship model

KW - Relationship schema

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749591831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749591831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0265407506065989

DO - 10.1177/0265407506065989

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 629

EP - 653

JO - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

JF - Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

SN - 0265-4075

IS - 4

ER -