TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the injury prevention impact of mandatory alcohol ignition interlock installation in all new US vehicles
AU - Carter, Patrick M.
AU - Flannagan, Carol A.C.
AU - Bingham, C. Raymond
AU - Cunningham, Rebecca M.
AU - Rupp, Jonathan D.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Objectives: We estimated the injury prevention impact and cost savings associated with alcohol interlock installation in all new US vehicles. Methods: We identified fatal and nonfatal injuries associated with drinking driver vehicle crashes from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and National Automotive Sampling System's General Estimates System data sets (2006-2010). We derived the estimated impact of universal interlock installation using an estimate of the proportion of alcohol-related crashes that were preventable in vehicles<1 year-old. We repeated this analysis for each subsequent year, assuming a 15-year implementation. We applied existing crash-induced injury cost metrics to approximate economic savings, and we used a sensitivity analysis to examine results with varying device effectiveness. Results: Over 15 years, 85% of crash fatalities (>59000) and 84% to 88% of nonfatal injuries (>1.25 million) attributed to drinking drivers would be prevented, saving an estimated $342 billion in injury-related costs, with the greatest injury and cost benefit realized among recently legal drinking drivers. Cost savings outweighed installation costs after 3 years, with the policy remaining cost effective provided device effectiveness remained above approximately 25%. Conclusions: Alcohol interlock installation in all new vehicles is likely a cost-effective primary prevention policy that will substantially reduce alcohol-involved crash fatalities and injuries, especially among young vulnerable drivers.
AB - Objectives: We estimated the injury prevention impact and cost savings associated with alcohol interlock installation in all new US vehicles. Methods: We identified fatal and nonfatal injuries associated with drinking driver vehicle crashes from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and National Automotive Sampling System's General Estimates System data sets (2006-2010). We derived the estimated impact of universal interlock installation using an estimate of the proportion of alcohol-related crashes that were preventable in vehicles<1 year-old. We repeated this analysis for each subsequent year, assuming a 15-year implementation. We applied existing crash-induced injury cost metrics to approximate economic savings, and we used a sensitivity analysis to examine results with varying device effectiveness. Results: Over 15 years, 85% of crash fatalities (>59000) and 84% to 88% of nonfatal injuries (>1.25 million) attributed to drinking drivers would be prevented, saving an estimated $342 billion in injury-related costs, with the greatest injury and cost benefit realized among recently legal drinking drivers. Cost savings outweighed installation costs after 3 years, with the policy remaining cost effective provided device effectiveness remained above approximately 25%. Conclusions: Alcohol interlock installation in all new vehicles is likely a cost-effective primary prevention policy that will substantially reduce alcohol-involved crash fatalities and injuries, especially among young vulnerable drivers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926630920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926630920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302445
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302445
M3 - Article
C2 - 25790385
AN - SCOPUS:84926630920
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 105
SP - 1028
EP - 1035
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 5
ER -