Modeling the effect of social networks on adoption of multifunctional agriculture

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rotational grazing (RG) has attracted much attention as a cornerstone of multifunctional agriculture (MFA) in animal systems, potentially capable of producing a range of goods and services of value to diverse stakeholders in agricultural landscapes and rural communities, as well as broader societal benefits. Despite these benefits, global adoption of MFA has been uneven, with some places seeing active participation, while others have seen limited growth. Recent conceptual models of MFA emphasize the potential for bottom-up processes and linkages among social and environmental systems to promote multifunctionality. Social networks are critical to these explanations but how and why these networks matter is unclear. We investigated fifty-three farms in three states in the United States (New York, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania) and developed a stylized model of social networks and systemic change in the dairy farming system. We found that social networks are important to RG adoption but their impact is contingent on social and spatial factors. Effects of networks on farmer decision making differ according to whether they comprise weak-tie relationships, which bridge across disparate people and organizations, or strong-tie relationships, which are shared by groups in which members are well known to one another. RG adoption is also dependent on features of the social landscape including the number of dairy households, the probability of neighboring farmers sharing strong ties, and the role of space in how networks are formed. The model replicates features of real-world adoption of RG practices in the Eastern US and illustrates pathways toward greater multifunctionality in the dairy landscape. Such models are likely to be of heuristic value in network-focused strategies for agricultural development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)388-401
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Modelling and Software
Volume75
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

social network
Agriculture
Dairies
grazing
agriculture
modeling
dairy farming
agricultural development
heuristics
farming system
Farms
Animals
stakeholder
agricultural land
Decision making
decision making
farm
effect
animal

Keywords

  • Agent based model
  • Land change
  • Multifunctional agriculture
  • Rotational grazing
  • Social networks

Cite this

@article{217ce77d6b9f4308862733e992a95287,
title = "Modeling the effect of social networks on adoption of multifunctional agriculture",
abstract = "Rotational grazing (RG) has attracted much attention as a cornerstone of multifunctional agriculture (MFA) in animal systems, potentially capable of producing a range of goods and services of value to diverse stakeholders in agricultural landscapes and rural communities, as well as broader societal benefits. Despite these benefits, global adoption of MFA has been uneven, with some places seeing active participation, while others have seen limited growth. Recent conceptual models of MFA emphasize the potential for bottom-up processes and linkages among social and environmental systems to promote multifunctionality. Social networks are critical to these explanations but how and why these networks matter is unclear. We investigated fifty-three farms in three states in the United States (New York, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania) and developed a stylized model of social networks and systemic change in the dairy farming system. We found that social networks are important to RG adoption but their impact is contingent on social and spatial factors. Effects of networks on farmer decision making differ according to whether they comprise weak-tie relationships, which bridge across disparate people and organizations, or strong-tie relationships, which are shared by groups in which members are well known to one another. RG adoption is also dependent on features of the social landscape including the number of dairy households, the probability of neighboring farmers sharing strong ties, and the role of space in how networks are formed. The model replicates features of real-world adoption of RG practices in the Eastern US and illustrates pathways toward greater multifunctionality in the dairy landscape. Such models are likely to be of heuristic value in network-focused strategies for agricultural development.",
keywords = "Agent based model, Land change, Multifunctional agriculture, Rotational grazing, Social networks",
author = "Manson, {Steven M.} and Jordan, {Nicholas R.} and Nelson, {Kristen C.} and Brummel, {Rachel F.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "388--401",
journal = "Environmental Modelling and Software",
issn = "1364-8152",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling the effect of social networks on adoption of multifunctional agriculture

AU - Manson, Steven M.

AU - Jordan, Nicholas R.

AU - Nelson, Kristen C.

AU - Brummel, Rachel F.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Rotational grazing (RG) has attracted much attention as a cornerstone of multifunctional agriculture (MFA) in animal systems, potentially capable of producing a range of goods and services of value to diverse stakeholders in agricultural landscapes and rural communities, as well as broader societal benefits. Despite these benefits, global adoption of MFA has been uneven, with some places seeing active participation, while others have seen limited growth. Recent conceptual models of MFA emphasize the potential for bottom-up processes and linkages among social and environmental systems to promote multifunctionality. Social networks are critical to these explanations but how and why these networks matter is unclear. We investigated fifty-three farms in three states in the United States (New York, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania) and developed a stylized model of social networks and systemic change in the dairy farming system. We found that social networks are important to RG adoption but their impact is contingent on social and spatial factors. Effects of networks on farmer decision making differ according to whether they comprise weak-tie relationships, which bridge across disparate people and organizations, or strong-tie relationships, which are shared by groups in which members are well known to one another. RG adoption is also dependent on features of the social landscape including the number of dairy households, the probability of neighboring farmers sharing strong ties, and the role of space in how networks are formed. The model replicates features of real-world adoption of RG practices in the Eastern US and illustrates pathways toward greater multifunctionality in the dairy landscape. Such models are likely to be of heuristic value in network-focused strategies for agricultural development.

AB - Rotational grazing (RG) has attracted much attention as a cornerstone of multifunctional agriculture (MFA) in animal systems, potentially capable of producing a range of goods and services of value to diverse stakeholders in agricultural landscapes and rural communities, as well as broader societal benefits. Despite these benefits, global adoption of MFA has been uneven, with some places seeing active participation, while others have seen limited growth. Recent conceptual models of MFA emphasize the potential for bottom-up processes and linkages among social and environmental systems to promote multifunctionality. Social networks are critical to these explanations but how and why these networks matter is unclear. We investigated fifty-three farms in three states in the United States (New York, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania) and developed a stylized model of social networks and systemic change in the dairy farming system. We found that social networks are important to RG adoption but their impact is contingent on social and spatial factors. Effects of networks on farmer decision making differ according to whether they comprise weak-tie relationships, which bridge across disparate people and organizations, or strong-tie relationships, which are shared by groups in which members are well known to one another. RG adoption is also dependent on features of the social landscape including the number of dairy households, the probability of neighboring farmers sharing strong ties, and the role of space in how networks are formed. The model replicates features of real-world adoption of RG practices in the Eastern US and illustrates pathways toward greater multifunctionality in the dairy landscape. Such models are likely to be of heuristic value in network-focused strategies for agricultural development.

KW - Agent based model

KW - Land change

KW - Multifunctional agriculture

KW - Rotational grazing

KW - Social networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964426647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964426647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.015

DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 26744579

AN - SCOPUS:84964426647

VL - 75

SP - 388

EP - 401

JO - Environmental Modelling and Software

JF - Environmental Modelling and Software

SN - 1364-8152

ER -