Modeling cost-effectiveness of risk-based bovine tuberculosis surveillance in Minnesota

Szu Yu Zoe Kao, Kimberly VanderWaal, Eva Enns, Meggan E Craft, Julio Alvarez, Catalina Picasso, Scott J Wells

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the United States, slaughter surveillance combined with other measures has effectively maintained a very low prevalence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB). However, bTB continues to be sporadically detected, causing substantial economic burden to the government and cattle producers. To detect the infection earlier and reduce sudden economic losses, additional risk-based surveillance of live animals might be more cost-effective than slaughter surveillance alone to detect and prevent bTB infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate alternative risk-based surveillance strategies targeting high-risk herds to complement slaughter surveillance in a region with very low bTB prevalence. We developed an integrated within- and between-herd bTB transmission model with simulated premises-level cattle movements among beef and dairy herds in Minnesota for 10 years. We constructed ten risk-based surveillance strategies for beef herds and dairy herds, and predicted the epidemiological outcomes and costs for each strategy in combination with slaughter surveillance. Our models showed that slaughter surveillance alone resulted in low risk of between-herd transmission with typically small outbreak sizes, and also cost less compared to alternative risk-based surveillance measures. However, risk-based surveillance strategies could reduce the time to detect infection and the time to reach disease freedom by up to 9 months. At a higher initial prevalence, alternative risk-based surveillance could reduce the number of infected herds and shorten the time to disease freedom by almost 3 years (34–35 months). Our findings suggest that risk-based surveillance could detect infection more quickly and allow affected regions to reach disease freedom faster. If the bTB status of the affected regions changes after an outbreak happens, the reduced time to disease freedom could reduce the economic impact on the affected region.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalPreventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume159
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Bovine Tuberculosis
bovine tuberculosis
cost effectiveness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
monitoring
slaughter
herds
Economics
Infection
Costs and Cost Analysis
Disease Outbreaks
dairy herds
infection
beef
economics
cattle
economic impact

Keywords

  • Bovine tuberculosis
  • Cattle movements
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Disease spread
  • Mycobacterium bovis
  • Targeted surveillance

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Modeling cost-effectiveness of risk-based bovine tuberculosis surveillance in Minnesota. / Kao, Szu Yu Zoe; VanderWaal, Kimberly; Enns, Eva; Craft, Meggan E; Alvarez, Julio; Picasso, Catalina; Wells, Scott J.

In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 159, 01.11.2018, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d8c20a16fb644c8abf00c83152d993f,
title = "Modeling cost-effectiveness of risk-based bovine tuberculosis surveillance in Minnesota",
abstract = "In the United States, slaughter surveillance combined with other measures has effectively maintained a very low prevalence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB). However, bTB continues to be sporadically detected, causing substantial economic burden to the government and cattle producers. To detect the infection earlier and reduce sudden economic losses, additional risk-based surveillance of live animals might be more cost-effective than slaughter surveillance alone to detect and prevent bTB infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate alternative risk-based surveillance strategies targeting high-risk herds to complement slaughter surveillance in a region with very low bTB prevalence. We developed an integrated within- and between-herd bTB transmission model with simulated premises-level cattle movements among beef and dairy herds in Minnesota for 10 years. We constructed ten risk-based surveillance strategies for beef herds and dairy herds, and predicted the epidemiological outcomes and costs for each strategy in combination with slaughter surveillance. Our models showed that slaughter surveillance alone resulted in low risk of between-herd transmission with typically small outbreak sizes, and also cost less compared to alternative risk-based surveillance measures. However, risk-based surveillance strategies could reduce the time to detect infection and the time to reach disease freedom by up to 9 months. At a higher initial prevalence, alternative risk-based surveillance could reduce the number of infected herds and shorten the time to disease freedom by almost 3 years (34–35 months). Our findings suggest that risk-based surveillance could detect infection more quickly and allow affected regions to reach disease freedom faster. If the bTB status of the affected regions changes after an outbreak happens, the reduced time to disease freedom could reduce the economic impact on the affected region.",
keywords = "Bovine tuberculosis, Cattle movements, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Disease spread, Mycobacterium bovis, Targeted surveillance",
author = "Kao, {Szu Yu Zoe} and Kimberly VanderWaal and Eva Enns and Craft, {Meggan E} and Julio Alvarez and Catalina Picasso and Wells, {Scott J}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.08.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "159",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling cost-effectiveness of risk-based bovine tuberculosis surveillance in Minnesota

AU - Kao, Szu Yu Zoe

AU - VanderWaal, Kimberly

AU - Enns, Eva

AU - Craft, Meggan E

AU - Alvarez, Julio

AU - Picasso, Catalina

AU - Wells, Scott J

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - In the United States, slaughter surveillance combined with other measures has effectively maintained a very low prevalence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB). However, bTB continues to be sporadically detected, causing substantial economic burden to the government and cattle producers. To detect the infection earlier and reduce sudden economic losses, additional risk-based surveillance of live animals might be more cost-effective than slaughter surveillance alone to detect and prevent bTB infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate alternative risk-based surveillance strategies targeting high-risk herds to complement slaughter surveillance in a region with very low bTB prevalence. We developed an integrated within- and between-herd bTB transmission model with simulated premises-level cattle movements among beef and dairy herds in Minnesota for 10 years. We constructed ten risk-based surveillance strategies for beef herds and dairy herds, and predicted the epidemiological outcomes and costs for each strategy in combination with slaughter surveillance. Our models showed that slaughter surveillance alone resulted in low risk of between-herd transmission with typically small outbreak sizes, and also cost less compared to alternative risk-based surveillance measures. However, risk-based surveillance strategies could reduce the time to detect infection and the time to reach disease freedom by up to 9 months. At a higher initial prevalence, alternative risk-based surveillance could reduce the number of infected herds and shorten the time to disease freedom by almost 3 years (34–35 months). Our findings suggest that risk-based surveillance could detect infection more quickly and allow affected regions to reach disease freedom faster. If the bTB status of the affected regions changes after an outbreak happens, the reduced time to disease freedom could reduce the economic impact on the affected region.

AB - In the United States, slaughter surveillance combined with other measures has effectively maintained a very low prevalence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB). However, bTB continues to be sporadically detected, causing substantial economic burden to the government and cattle producers. To detect the infection earlier and reduce sudden economic losses, additional risk-based surveillance of live animals might be more cost-effective than slaughter surveillance alone to detect and prevent bTB infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate alternative risk-based surveillance strategies targeting high-risk herds to complement slaughter surveillance in a region with very low bTB prevalence. We developed an integrated within- and between-herd bTB transmission model with simulated premises-level cattle movements among beef and dairy herds in Minnesota for 10 years. We constructed ten risk-based surveillance strategies for beef herds and dairy herds, and predicted the epidemiological outcomes and costs for each strategy in combination with slaughter surveillance. Our models showed that slaughter surveillance alone resulted in low risk of between-herd transmission with typically small outbreak sizes, and also cost less compared to alternative risk-based surveillance measures. However, risk-based surveillance strategies could reduce the time to detect infection and the time to reach disease freedom by up to 9 months. At a higher initial prevalence, alternative risk-based surveillance could reduce the number of infected herds and shorten the time to disease freedom by almost 3 years (34–35 months). Our findings suggest that risk-based surveillance could detect infection more quickly and allow affected regions to reach disease freedom faster. If the bTB status of the affected regions changes after an outbreak happens, the reduced time to disease freedom could reduce the economic impact on the affected region.

KW - Bovine tuberculosis

KW - Cattle movements

KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis

KW - Disease spread

KW - Mycobacterium bovis

KW - Targeted surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052636301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052636301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.08.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 30314771

AN - SCOPUS:85052636301

VL - 159

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

ER -