TY - JOUR
T1 - Mixed Methods Research in Comparative and International Education
T2 - Philosophical and Methodological Considerations to Enhance Epistemological Pluralism
AU - Dejaeghere, Joan G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Comparative and International Education Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Mixed methods research (MMR) has been increasingly used in comparative and international education (CIE), but there is less scholarship that discusses the philosophical and methodological bases for such research. This article argues that much research in CIE assumes an ontologically complex and contingent reality and an interdisciplinary and pluralistic epistemology. MMR can offer a research approach that is pluralistic, but it requires reflexivity to consider the ontological and epistemological assumptions of such studies. The article discusses challenges in the field to engaging in pluralist and transdisciplinary research, and it puts forward a reflexive approach to integrating paradigms in MMR with a critical realist ontology and epistemology as a coherent pluralist approach. Finally, two examples of collaborative MMR illustrate how such studies do or do not engage with ontological assumptions and epistemological pluralism. These examples show reflexivity can be used to when doing MMR in the field.
AB - Mixed methods research (MMR) has been increasingly used in comparative and international education (CIE), but there is less scholarship that discusses the philosophical and methodological bases for such research. This article argues that much research in CIE assumes an ontologically complex and contingent reality and an interdisciplinary and pluralistic epistemology. MMR can offer a research approach that is pluralistic, but it requires reflexivity to consider the ontological and epistemological assumptions of such studies. The article discusses challenges in the field to engaging in pluralist and transdisciplinary research, and it puts forward a reflexive approach to integrating paradigms in MMR with a critical realist ontology and epistemology as a coherent pluralist approach. Finally, two examples of collaborative MMR illustrate how such studies do or do not engage with ontological assumptions and epistemological pluralism. These examples show reflexivity can be used to when doing MMR in the field.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205007666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205007666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/731726
DO - 10.1086/731726
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205007666
SN - 0010-4086
VL - 68
SP - 489
EP - 510
JO - Comparative Education Review
JF - Comparative Education Review
IS - 3
ER -