Minireview: Were the IGF signaling inhibitors all bad?

Heather Beck, Douglas Yee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Preclinical studies in the 1980s defined a role for IGF signaling in the development and sustainability of the malignant process. Subsequently, antibody, tyrosine kinase, and ligand inhibitors of the IGF receptor were manufactured. In the past decade, numerous clinical trials have tested the efficacy of IGF receptor inhibitors in the treatment of advanced tumors. Early-phase trials in heavily pretreated populations showed promise with complete or partial responses in a few patients and stable disease in many more. Unfortunately, the results of the early-phase trials did not pan out to later-phase trials. The lack of use of biomarkers to define subsets of patients that may benefit from IGF receptor blockade and compensatory signaling via other growth factor receptors such as the insulin, GH, and epidermal growth factor receptors may have played a role in the lack of efficacy of IGF receptor inhibition in phase III trials. Although these trials failed to show benefit, the trials have revealed previously unknown knowledge regarding the complex nature of IGF signaling. The knowledge obtained from these trials will be useful in designing future trials studying inhibitors of growth factor signaling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1549-1557
Number of pages9
JournalMolecular Endocrinology
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Minireview: Were the IGF signaling inhibitors all bad?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this