Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: The current evidence

Christopher T. Martin, Lucas Haase, Paul A. Lender, David W. Polly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Fusion of the sacroiliac (SI) joint as a treatment for low back pain remains controversial. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the current literature and clinical outcomes of SI joint fusion surgery. Methods: We conducted a literature review and included studies with the term "sacroiliac joint fusion" that had at least 12 months of clinical follow-up, reported on minimally invasive techniques, and included patient-reported outcome measures. Results: Two approach types (dorsal and lateral) and numerous different implant manufacturers were identified. Most studies included level 4 data, with a small number of level 2 prospective cohort studies and 2 prospective level 1 studies. Every reviewed study reported clinical benefit in terms of improved pain scores or improvement in validated disability measures. Complication rates were low. Conclusions: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion provides clinically significant improvement in pain scores and disability in most patients, across multiple studies and implant manufacturers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S20-S29
JournalInternational Journal of Spine Surgery
Volume14
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2020

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Biomechanics
  • Evidence
  • Outcomes
  • Review
  • SI fusion
  • Sacroiliac joint fusion

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: The current evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this