Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-The eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study

James D. Luketich, Arjun Pennathur, Yoko Franchetti, Paul J. Catalano, Scott Swanson, David J. Sugarbaker, Alberto De Hoyos, Michael A. Maddaus, Ninh T. Nguyen, Al B. Benson, Hiran C. Fernando

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

112 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this trial was to assess the feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in a multi-institutional setting. Background: Esophagectomy is an important, potentially curative treatment for localized esophageal cancer, but is a complex operation. MIEmay decrease the morbidity and mortality of resection and single-institution studies have demonstrated successful outcomes with MIE. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, phase II, prospective, cooperative group study (coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) to evaluate the feasibility of MIE. Patients with biopsy-proven high-grade dysplasia or esophageal cancer were enrolled at 17 credentialed sites. Protocol surgery consisted of either 3-stage MIE or Ivor Lewis MIE. The primary end point was 30-day mortality. Secondary end points included adverse events, duration of hospital-stay, and 3-year outcomes. Results: Protocol surgery was completed in 95 of the 104 patients eligible for the primary analysis (91.3%). The 30-day mortality in eligible patients who underwentMIE was 2.1%; perioperative mortality in all registered patients eligible for primary analysis was 2.9%. Median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 2 and 9 days, respectively. Grade 3 or higher adverse events included anastomotic leak (8.6%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (5.7%), pneumonitis (3.8%), and atrial fibrillation (2.9%). At a median follow-up of 35.8 months, the estimated 3-year overall survival was 58.4% (95% confidence interval: 47.7%-67.6%). Locoregional recurrence occurred in only 7 patients (6.7%). Conclusions: This prospective multicenter study demonstrated that MIE is feasible and safe with low perioperative morbidity and mortality and good oncological results. This approach can be adopted by other centers with appropriate expertise in open esophagectomy and minimally invasive surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)702-707
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume261
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2015

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest related to this article. This study was coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and supported in part by Public Health Service Grants CA23318, CA66636, CA21115, CA39229, CA32291, CA17145 and from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services.

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Esophageal resection
  • Esophagectomy
  • MIE
  • Minimally invasive
  • Surgical procedures

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-The eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this