Microbiota transplant for hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: The THEMATIC trial

  • Jasmohan S. Bajaj
  • , Andrew Fagan
  • , Edith A. Gavis
  • , Richard K. Sterling
  • , Mary Leslie Gallagher
  • , Hannah Lee
  • , Scott C. Matherly
  • , Mohammed S. Siddiqui
  • , Amy Bartels
  • , Travis Mousel
  • , Brian C. Davis
  • , Puneet Puri
  • , Michael Fuchs
  • , Daphne M. Moutsoglou
  • , Leroy R. Thacker
  • , Masoumeh Sikaroodi
  • , Patrick M. Gillevet
  • , Alexander Khoruts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background & Aims: Preventing hepatic encephalopathy (HE) recurrence in cirrhosis, which is associated with an altered gut-liver-brain axis, is an unmet need. Benefits of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) have been shown in phase I studies, but route and dose-related questions remain. Methods: We performed a phase II randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial of capsule and enema FMT in patients with cirrhosis and HE on lactulose and rifaximin. Participants were randomized into four groups (3 active doses; 2 active and 1 placebo dose; 1 active and 2 placebo doses; 3 placebo doses). Each patient received two capsules and one enema (either placebo or FMT) and were followed for 6 months. The primary outcome was FMT-related (serious) adverse events ([s]AEs)/AEs using intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes were HE recurrence, all-cause hospitalizations, death, donor engraftment, and quality-of-life. FMT was from a vegan or omnivorous donor. Results: We enrolled 60 patients (15/group) with similar baseline characteristics. FMT was safe, with no FMT-related SAEs/AEs reported. Overall SAEs (p = 0.96) or death (p = 1.0) were similar. There were significant differences in HE recurrence between groups (p = 0.035, Cramer's V = 0.39). On post hoc analysis, recurrence was highest in the all-placebo vs. any FMT group (40% vs. 9%; odds ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.64). Within the FMT groups, HE recurrence rates were similar regardless of route, doses, or donor type. Quality of life improved in FMT-recipient groups. Engraftment was highest in those with high pre-FMT Lachnospiraceae and lower in those whose HE recurred. Conclusions: FMT was safe in patients with cirrhosis and HE on maximal therapy, with no FMT-related AEs reported, regardless of dose, route, or donor type. On post hoc analysis, HE recurrence was highest in the placebo-only group and linked with lower baseline Lachnospiraceae and reduced donor engraftment. Impact and implications: Patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) already on maximal therapy could have recurrences, which worsen prognosis and are not prioritized for liver transplant. In this phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with cirrhosis and prior overt HE, we found that fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) was safe and well tolerated regardless of route of delivery (oral or enema), number of doses (1 through 3), or donor type (vegan or omnivorous). HE recurrence, which was a key secondary endpoint, was different between groups and, on post hoc analysis, lowest in groups that received any FMT. Donor engraftment was higher in those with higher relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae, which was associated with lower HE recurrence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-91
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025

Keywords

  • Lachnospiraceae
  • Rifaximin
  • donors
  • engraftment
  • falls
  • fecal microbiota transplant
  • hospitalizations
  • lactulose
  • outcomes
  • recurrence

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Clinical Trial, Phase II

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microbiota transplant for hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: The THEMATIC trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this