Methodological issues in legal communication research: What can trial simulations tell us?

Gerald R. Miller, Norman E. Fontes, Franklin J. Boster, Michael J. Sunnafrank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing partially upon examples from a four-year program of research dealing with the use of videotape in courtroom trials, this paper critically discusses three aspects of trial simulations used to study juror responses: (1) the individuals used as jurors, as well as their expectations concerning the juror task; (2) the amount of information provided for jurors, as well as the primary medium by which it is communicated; and (3) the presence or absence of jury deliberation, particularly as it relates to the relationship between individual (juror) and group (jury) decisions. Three methodological caveats are suggested for legal communication research employing trial simulations, and it is argued that adherence to them will enhance the ecological validity of legal communication research findings generated in simulated trial environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-46
Number of pages14
JournalCommunication Monographs
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1983

Fingerprint

communication research
simulation
Communication
group decision
deliberation
Communication Research
Simulation
Jurors
Juries

Cite this

Methodological issues in legal communication research : What can trial simulations tell us? / Miller, Gerald R.; Fontes, Norman E.; Boster, Franklin J.; Sunnafrank, Michael J.

In: Communication Monographs, Vol. 50, No. 1, 03.1983, p. 33-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Gerald R. ; Fontes, Norman E. ; Boster, Franklin J. ; Sunnafrank, Michael J. / Methodological issues in legal communication research : What can trial simulations tell us?. In: Communication Monographs. 1983 ; Vol. 50, No. 1. pp. 33-46.
@article{12e953ba85f44c8ba23463057ade3ce9,
title = "Methodological issues in legal communication research: What can trial simulations tell us?",
abstract = "Drawing partially upon examples from a four-year program of research dealing with the use of videotape in courtroom trials, this paper critically discusses three aspects of trial simulations used to study juror responses: (1) the individuals used as jurors, as well as their expectations concerning the juror task; (2) the amount of information provided for jurors, as well as the primary medium by which it is communicated; and (3) the presence or absence of jury deliberation, particularly as it relates to the relationship between individual (juror) and group (jury) decisions. Three methodological caveats are suggested for legal communication research employing trial simulations, and it is argued that adherence to them will enhance the ecological validity of legal communication research findings generated in simulated trial environments.",
author = "Miller, {Gerald R.} and Fontes, {Norman E.} and Boster, {Franklin J.} and Sunnafrank, {Michael J.}",
year = "1983",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/03637758309390152",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "33--46",
journal = "Communication Monographs",
issn = "0363-7751",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological issues in legal communication research

T2 - What can trial simulations tell us?

AU - Miller, Gerald R.

AU - Fontes, Norman E.

AU - Boster, Franklin J.

AU - Sunnafrank, Michael J.

PY - 1983/3

Y1 - 1983/3

N2 - Drawing partially upon examples from a four-year program of research dealing with the use of videotape in courtroom trials, this paper critically discusses three aspects of trial simulations used to study juror responses: (1) the individuals used as jurors, as well as their expectations concerning the juror task; (2) the amount of information provided for jurors, as well as the primary medium by which it is communicated; and (3) the presence or absence of jury deliberation, particularly as it relates to the relationship between individual (juror) and group (jury) decisions. Three methodological caveats are suggested for legal communication research employing trial simulations, and it is argued that adherence to them will enhance the ecological validity of legal communication research findings generated in simulated trial environments.

AB - Drawing partially upon examples from a four-year program of research dealing with the use of videotape in courtroom trials, this paper critically discusses three aspects of trial simulations used to study juror responses: (1) the individuals used as jurors, as well as their expectations concerning the juror task; (2) the amount of information provided for jurors, as well as the primary medium by which it is communicated; and (3) the presence or absence of jury deliberation, particularly as it relates to the relationship between individual (juror) and group (jury) decisions. Three methodological caveats are suggested for legal communication research employing trial simulations, and it is argued that adherence to them will enhance the ecological validity of legal communication research findings generated in simulated trial environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040598707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040598707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03637758309390152

DO - 10.1080/03637758309390152

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0040598707

VL - 50

SP - 33

EP - 46

JO - Communication Monographs

JF - Communication Monographs

SN - 0363-7751

IS - 1

ER -