Methamphetamine in three small midwestern cities: Evidence of a moral panic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


This study examined the coverage of methamphetamine from 1997 to 2005 by three newspapers serving small Midwestern cities and contrasted their portrayals of methamphetamine problems with available data on the severity of the meth problem in each locality. Results of quantitative and qualitative content analyses show that—to varying degrees, across sites and over time—newspaper coverage of meth was disproportionate to the scale of the meth problem as indicated by site-specific treatment admissions data. To some extent, each of the three newspapers used drug-scare rhetoric (e.g., medical metaphors such as “plague”) to describe the prevalence and effects of meth. Results indicate that two of the three newspapers’ portrayals of meth were conducive to promoting a moral panic over the drug. Potential explanations for variations in coverage are discussed, and findings are considered in light of research on prior drug scares.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-239
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Psychoactive Drugs
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2009


  • Drug scare
  • Media
  • Methamphetamine
  • Moral panic


Dive into the research topics of 'Methamphetamine in three small midwestern cities: Evidence of a moral panic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this