TY - JOUR
T1 - Medications for opioid use disorder among pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies before and after Medicaid expansion
T2 - A retrospective study of admissions to treatment centers in the United States
AU - Winkelman, Tyler N.A.
AU - Ford, Becky R.
AU - Shlafer, Rebecca J.
AU - McWilliams, Anna
AU - Admon, Lindsay K.
AU - Patrick, Stephen W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Winkelman et al.
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Criminal justice involvement is common among pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Medications for OUD improve pregnancy-related outcomes, but trends in treatment data among justice-involved pregnant women are limited. We sought to examine trends in medications for OUD among pregnant women referred to treatment by criminal justice agencies and other sources before and after the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion.METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a serial, cross-sectional analysis using 1992-2017 data from pregnant women admitted to treatment facilities for OUD using a national survey of substance use treatment facilities in the United States (N = 131,838). We used multiple logistic regression and difference-in-differences methods to assess trends in medications for OUD by referral source. Women in the sample were predominantly aged 18-29 (63.3%), white non-Hispanic, high school graduates, and not employed. Over the study period, 26.3% (95% CI 25.7-27.0) of pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies received medications for OUD, which was significantly less than those with individual referrals (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.43-0.46; P < 0.001) or those referred from other sources (ARR 0.51, 95% CI 0.50-0.53; P < 0.001). Among pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies, receipt of medications for OUD increased significantly more in states that expanded Medicaid (n = 32) compared with nonexpansion states (n = 18) (adjusted difference-in-differences: 12.0 percentage points, 95% CI 1.0-23.0; P = 0.03). Limitations of this study include encounters that are at treatment centers only and that do not encompass buprenorphine prescribed in ambulatory care settings, prisons, or jails.CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with OUD referred by criminal justice agencies received evidence-based treatment at lower rates than women referred through other sources. Improving access to medications for OUD for pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies could provide public health benefits to mothers, infants, and communities. Medicaid expansion is a potential mechanism for expanding access to evidence-based treatment for pregnant women in the US.
AB - BACKGROUND: Criminal justice involvement is common among pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Medications for OUD improve pregnancy-related outcomes, but trends in treatment data among justice-involved pregnant women are limited. We sought to examine trends in medications for OUD among pregnant women referred to treatment by criminal justice agencies and other sources before and after the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion.METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a serial, cross-sectional analysis using 1992-2017 data from pregnant women admitted to treatment facilities for OUD using a national survey of substance use treatment facilities in the United States (N = 131,838). We used multiple logistic regression and difference-in-differences methods to assess trends in medications for OUD by referral source. Women in the sample were predominantly aged 18-29 (63.3%), white non-Hispanic, high school graduates, and not employed. Over the study period, 26.3% (95% CI 25.7-27.0) of pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies received medications for OUD, which was significantly less than those with individual referrals (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.43-0.46; P < 0.001) or those referred from other sources (ARR 0.51, 95% CI 0.50-0.53; P < 0.001). Among pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies, receipt of medications for OUD increased significantly more in states that expanded Medicaid (n = 32) compared with nonexpansion states (n = 18) (adjusted difference-in-differences: 12.0 percentage points, 95% CI 1.0-23.0; P = 0.03). Limitations of this study include encounters that are at treatment centers only and that do not encompass buprenorphine prescribed in ambulatory care settings, prisons, or jails.CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with OUD referred by criminal justice agencies received evidence-based treatment at lower rates than women referred through other sources. Improving access to medications for OUD for pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies could provide public health benefits to mothers, infants, and communities. Medicaid expansion is a potential mechanism for expanding access to evidence-based treatment for pregnant women in the US.
KW - Adult
KW - Evidence-Based Medicine/statistics & numerical data
KW - Female
KW - Hispanic Americans
KW - Humans
KW - Medicaid/statistics & numerical data
KW - Opiate Substitution Treatment
KW - Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy
KW - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - United States
KW - Young Adult
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084912622&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084912622&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003119
DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003119
M3 - Article
C2 - 32421717
AN - SCOPUS:85084912622
SN - 1549-1277
VL - 17
JO - Nature Methods
JF - Nature Methods
IS - 5
M1 - e1003119
ER -