Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

quality measurement and beneficiary attribution

Bryan E Dowd, Chia hsuan Li, Tami C Swenson, Robert Coulam, Jesse Levy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore two issues that are relevant to inclusion of PQRS reporting in a value-based payment system: (1) what are the characteristics of PQRS reports and the providers who file them; and (2) could PQRS provide active attribution information to supplement existing attribution algorithms?

DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from five states for the years 2008 (the first full year of the program) and 2009, we examined the number and type of providers who reported PQRS measures and the types of measures that were reported. We then compared the PQRS reporting provider to the provider who supplied the plurality of the beneficiary's non-hospital evaluation and management (NH-E&M) visits.

RESULTS: Although PQRS-reporting providers provide only 17 percent of the beneficiary's NH-E&M visits on average in 2009, the provider who provided the plurality of visits supplied only 50 percent of such visits, on average.

IMPLICATIONS: PQRS reporting alone cannot solve the attribution problem that is inherent in traditional fee-for-service Medicare, but as PQRS participation increases, it could help improve both attribution and information regarding the quality of health care services delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)02.a04
JournalMedicare & medicaid research review
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Medicare
Physicians
Fee-for-Service Plans
Quality of Health Care
Health Services

Keywords

  • Medicare
  • PQRS
  • attribution
  • payment
  • physician
  • value

Cite this

Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) : quality measurement and beneficiary attribution. / Dowd, Bryan E; Li, Chia hsuan; Swenson, Tami C; Coulam, Robert; Levy, Jesse.

In: Medicare & medicaid research review, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 02.a04.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cf448f76c69f47cb85c836fb6b5fd04b,
title = "Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): quality measurement and beneficiary attribution",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To explore two issues that are relevant to inclusion of PQRS reporting in a value-based payment system: (1) what are the characteristics of PQRS reports and the providers who file them; and (2) could PQRS provide active attribution information to supplement existing attribution algorithms?DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from five states for the years 2008 (the first full year of the program) and 2009, we examined the number and type of providers who reported PQRS measures and the types of measures that were reported. We then compared the PQRS reporting provider to the provider who supplied the plurality of the beneficiary's non-hospital evaluation and management (NH-E&M) visits.RESULTS: Although PQRS-reporting providers provide only 17 percent of the beneficiary's NH-E&M visits on average in 2009, the provider who provided the plurality of visits supplied only 50 percent of such visits, on average.IMPLICATIONS: PQRS reporting alone cannot solve the attribution problem that is inherent in traditional fee-for-service Medicare, but as PQRS participation increases, it could help improve both attribution and information regarding the quality of health care services delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.",
keywords = "Medicare, PQRS, attribution, payment, physician, value",
author = "Dowd, {Bryan E} and Li, {Chia hsuan} and Swenson, {Tami C} and Robert Coulam and Jesse Levy",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a04",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "02.a04",
journal = "Health Care Financing Review",
issn = "2159-0354",
publisher = "Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Office of Research, Development & Information",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

T2 - quality measurement and beneficiary attribution

AU - Dowd, Bryan E

AU - Li, Chia hsuan

AU - Swenson, Tami C

AU - Coulam, Robert

AU - Levy, Jesse

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To explore two issues that are relevant to inclusion of PQRS reporting in a value-based payment system: (1) what are the characteristics of PQRS reports and the providers who file them; and (2) could PQRS provide active attribution information to supplement existing attribution algorithms?DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from five states for the years 2008 (the first full year of the program) and 2009, we examined the number and type of providers who reported PQRS measures and the types of measures that were reported. We then compared the PQRS reporting provider to the provider who supplied the plurality of the beneficiary's non-hospital evaluation and management (NH-E&M) visits.RESULTS: Although PQRS-reporting providers provide only 17 percent of the beneficiary's NH-E&M visits on average in 2009, the provider who provided the plurality of visits supplied only 50 percent of such visits, on average.IMPLICATIONS: PQRS reporting alone cannot solve the attribution problem that is inherent in traditional fee-for-service Medicare, but as PQRS participation increases, it could help improve both attribution and information regarding the quality of health care services delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.

AB - PURPOSE: To explore two issues that are relevant to inclusion of PQRS reporting in a value-based payment system: (1) what are the characteristics of PQRS reports and the providers who file them; and (2) could PQRS provide active attribution information to supplement existing attribution algorithms?DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from five states for the years 2008 (the first full year of the program) and 2009, we examined the number and type of providers who reported PQRS measures and the types of measures that were reported. We then compared the PQRS reporting provider to the provider who supplied the plurality of the beneficiary's non-hospital evaluation and management (NH-E&M) visits.RESULTS: Although PQRS-reporting providers provide only 17 percent of the beneficiary's NH-E&M visits on average in 2009, the provider who provided the plurality of visits supplied only 50 percent of such visits, on average.IMPLICATIONS: PQRS reporting alone cannot solve the attribution problem that is inherent in traditional fee-for-service Medicare, but as PQRS participation increases, it could help improve both attribution and information regarding the quality of health care services delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.

KW - Medicare

KW - PQRS

KW - attribution

KW - payment

KW - physician

KW - value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941365436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941365436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a04

DO - 10.5600/mmrr.004.02.a04

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 02.a04

JO - Health Care Financing Review

JF - Health Care Financing Review

SN - 2159-0354

IS - 2

ER -