TY - JOUR
T1 - Medicare work-related injuries
T2 - Underutilization of workers' compensation leads to higher out-of-pocket costs for older adults
AU - McFalls, Matthew
AU - Virnig, Beth A
AU - Ryan, Andrew
AU - Erickson, Darin J
AU - Kim, Hyun
AU - Jarosek, Stephanie
AU - Alexander, Bruce H
AU - Ramirez, Marizen R
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: Older adults may pay healthcare-related costs for work injuries if Medicare covers claims over workers' compensation (WC). We assessed Medicare enrollee costs after a work-related injury by WC status. Methods: We longitudinally analyzed Medicare fee-for-service claims (2016-2019) for age 65+ Medicare enrollees with work-related injuries, estimating WC effects on healthcare use and enrollee costs using difference-in-differences and quantile regression models. Results: WC covered at least one Medicare claim for 16% of the 13,039 enrollees with work-related injuries. Over 90 days, mean Medicare out-of-pocket costs were lower with WC ($447) than without ($778). With WC, enrollees owed $1,432 at the 90th percentile compared to $2,465 without, an adjusted difference of $600 (95% CL -767, -432). Conclusions: While WC covers some costs, Medicare claim billing increases after a work-related injury, often leading to substantial patient expenses.
AB - Objective: Older adults may pay healthcare-related costs for work injuries if Medicare covers claims over workers' compensation (WC). We assessed Medicare enrollee costs after a work-related injury by WC status. Methods: We longitudinally analyzed Medicare fee-for-service claims (2016-2019) for age 65+ Medicare enrollees with work-related injuries, estimating WC effects on healthcare use and enrollee costs using difference-in-differences and quantile regression models. Results: WC covered at least one Medicare claim for 16% of the 13,039 enrollees with work-related injuries. Over 90 days, mean Medicare out-of-pocket costs were lower with WC ($447) than without ($778). With WC, enrollees owed $1,432 at the 90th percentile compared to $2,465 without, an adjusted difference of $600 (95% CL -767, -432). Conclusions: While WC covers some costs, Medicare claim billing increases after a work-related injury, often leading to substantial patient expenses.
KW - aging workforce
KW - cost shift
KW - difference-in-differences modeling
KW - healthcare expenditures
KW - Occupational injuries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219657902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85219657902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/jom.0000000000003323
DO - 10.1097/jom.0000000000003323
M3 - Article
C2 - 39971894
AN - SCOPUS:85219657902
SN - 1076-2752
JO - Journal of occupational and environmental medicine
JF - Journal of occupational and environmental medicine
M1 - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003323
ER -