Medical scribes improve documentation consistency and efficiency in an otolaryngology clinic

Objective: Scribes in medical practice enable more efficient documentation requirements but insufficient analyses have occurred to fully evaluate their efficacy in otolaryngology. We analyzed pre/post metrics of scribe implementation that may aid practitioners in determining feasibility for use in their practices. Methods: 1808 patient charts were analyzed in The Epic Electronic Medical Record system (EMR) (903 pre and 905 post scribe implementation). We measured: clinic volumes, time saved in documentation, chart billing level, and lag days of chart closure. Results: Patient volumes increased by 3.02% with an 11–17% decrease in time spent in clinic/day and lag days for billing. The distribution of visits for new patients was 17.75% level 2, 51.45% level 3, 29.71% level 4 before the scribe and was 6.83% level 2, 89.21% level 3, 3.96% level 4 after the scribe. For established patients it was 3.97% level 2, 84.92% level 3, 8.93% level 4 before and 0.34% level 2, 91.76% level 3, 7.73% level 4 after. The change in level of documentation for established and new patients pre and post scribe implementation was not statistically significant (p = 0.821, 0.063, respectively). Charts were closed within 0 to 7 days with the implementation of a scribe instead of 7–21 days when awaiting dictations for transcription. Conclusions: The implementation of a scribe in an academic otolaryngology clinic facilitated more rapid completion of documentation while decreasing provider hours/day in clinic. We feel the analysis can be generalized to otolaryngology practitioners in general and the data structures we implemented are usable for others.