Mechanistic modeling of environmental drivers of woolly mammoth carrying capacity declines on St. Paul Island

Yue Wang, Warren Porter, Paul D. Mathewson, Paul A. Miller, Russell W. Graham, John W. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

On St. Paul Island, a remnant of the Bering Land Bridge, woolly mammoths persisted until 5,600 yr BP with no known predators or competitors, providing a natural system for studying hypothesized environmental drivers of extinction. These include overheating due to rising temperatures, starvation, and drought. Here, we test these hypotheses using Niche Mapper and LPJ-GUESS to mechanistically estimate mammoth metabolic rates and dietary and freshwater requirements and, from these, estimate variations in island carrying capacity on St. Paul for the last 17,000 yr. Population carrying capacity may have been several hundred individuals at the time of initial isolation from the mainland. Adult mammoths could have fasted for two to three months, indicating a necessary ability to access snow-buried forage. During the Holocene, vegetation net primary productivity increased, but shrinking island area overrode increased net primary productivity (NPP), lowering carrying capacity to ~100 individuals. NPP and freshwater availability alternated as critical limiting factors for this island population during the environmental changes of the late Pleistocene and Holocene. Only two or three individuals could have been sustained by the freshwater surplus in crater lakes (up to 18 individuals under the most optimistic parameter sensitivity experiments), suggesting that the St. Paul mammoth population was highly dependent on coastal freshwater sources. The simulations are consistent with the available proxy data, while highlighting the need to retrieve new paleohydrological proxy records from the coastal lagoons to test model predictions. More broadly, these findings reinforce the vulnerability of island megaherbivore populations to resource limitation and extinction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2721-2730
Number of pages10
JournalEcology
Volume99
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2018

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The work was funded by ARC-1203772 and ARC-1204033. We thank Feng He for assistance with obtaining and analyzing TraCE-21ka data and David Lorenz for assistance with calculating potential evapotranspiration. Many thanks to colleagues Scott Farley and Kevin Burke for their advice. Paul A. Miller is grateful to the Lund Centre for Studies of Carbon Cycle and Climate Interactions (LUCCI) and the strategic research areas MERGE and BECC for financial support. This work benefitted from discussions with others on the St. Paul research team, including Nancy Bigelow, Peter Heinzman, Lee Newsom, Beth Shapiro, and Matthew Wooller.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the Ecological Society of America

Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Beringia
  • carrying capacity
  • dynamic vegetation model
  • extinction
  • Holocene
  • island biogeography
  • LPJ-GUESS
  • mechanistic niche model
  • megafauna
  • Niche Mapper
  • woolly mammoth

Continental Scientific Drilling Facility tags

  • LAHI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanistic modeling of environmental drivers of woolly mammoth carrying capacity declines on St. Paul Island'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this