Measuring the strength of state-level alcohol control policies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe a multi-step method of coding the strength of 18 alcohol policies included in the Alcohol Policy Information System for each of the 50 states. After thoroughly reviewing each policy area, we chose components that were most important in categorizing the strength or restrictiveness of the policy using the following criteria: overall reach, enforceability, and implementation. We determined a unique coding scheme for each policy area. The total number of categories per policy area ranged from two to six, with categories numbered in an ordered sequence from least to most restrictive. We provide three examples of our coding schemes: Keg Registration, Underage Possession, and Sunday Sales. We also rank the states on their alcohol policy sum score. This study demonstrates how alcohol policies can be measured quantitatively, an important step for assessing the effects of alcohol policies on various outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-186
Number of pages16
JournalWorld Medical and Health Policy
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Alcohols
Information Systems

Keywords

  • alcohol
  • measurement
  • policy

Cite this

@article{4e173e24c02d4eacb97ac4f481abe201,
title = "Measuring the strength of state-level alcohol control policies",
abstract = "We describe a multi-step method of coding the strength of 18 alcohol policies included in the Alcohol Policy Information System for each of the 50 states. After thoroughly reviewing each policy area, we chose components that were most important in categorizing the strength or restrictiveness of the policy using the following criteria: overall reach, enforceability, and implementation. We determined a unique coding scheme for each policy area. The total number of categories per policy area ranged from two to six, with categories numbered in an ordered sequence from least to most restrictive. We provide three examples of our coding schemes: Keg Registration, Underage Possession, and Sunday Sales. We also rank the states on their alcohol policy sum score. This study demonstrates how alcohol policies can be measured quantitatively, an important step for assessing the effects of alcohol policies on various outcomes.",
keywords = "alcohol, measurement, policy",
author = "Erickson, {Darin J.} and Lenk, {Kathleen M.} and Toomey, {Traci L.} and Nelson, {Toben F.} and Rhonda Jones-Webb and Mosher, {James F.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/wmh3.97",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "171--186",
journal = "World Medical and Health Policy",
issn = "1948-4682",
publisher = "Berkeley Electronic Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the strength of state-level alcohol control policies

AU - Erickson, Darin J.

AU - Lenk, Kathleen M.

AU - Toomey, Traci L.

AU - Nelson, Toben F.

AU - Jones-Webb, Rhonda

AU - Mosher, James F.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - We describe a multi-step method of coding the strength of 18 alcohol policies included in the Alcohol Policy Information System for each of the 50 states. After thoroughly reviewing each policy area, we chose components that were most important in categorizing the strength or restrictiveness of the policy using the following criteria: overall reach, enforceability, and implementation. We determined a unique coding scheme for each policy area. The total number of categories per policy area ranged from two to six, with categories numbered in an ordered sequence from least to most restrictive. We provide three examples of our coding schemes: Keg Registration, Underage Possession, and Sunday Sales. We also rank the states on their alcohol policy sum score. This study demonstrates how alcohol policies can be measured quantitatively, an important step for assessing the effects of alcohol policies on various outcomes.

AB - We describe a multi-step method of coding the strength of 18 alcohol policies included in the Alcohol Policy Information System for each of the 50 states. After thoroughly reviewing each policy area, we chose components that were most important in categorizing the strength or restrictiveness of the policy using the following criteria: overall reach, enforceability, and implementation. We determined a unique coding scheme for each policy area. The total number of categories per policy area ranged from two to six, with categories numbered in an ordered sequence from least to most restrictive. We provide three examples of our coding schemes: Keg Registration, Underage Possession, and Sunday Sales. We also rank the states on their alcohol policy sum score. This study demonstrates how alcohol policies can be measured quantitatively, an important step for assessing the effects of alcohol policies on various outcomes.

KW - alcohol

KW - measurement

KW - policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906851441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906851441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/wmh3.97

DO - 10.1002/wmh3.97

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 171

EP - 186

JO - World Medical and Health Policy

JF - World Medical and Health Policy

SN - 1948-4682

IS - 3

ER -