TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services
AU - Schommer, Jon C.
AU - Kucukarslan, Suzan N.
PY - 1997/1/1
Y1 - 1997/1/1
N2 - Common conceptualizations of satisfaction are discussed, and different ways of measuring patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services are suggested. Patient satisfaction is becoming increasingly popular as an indicator of the quality of health care service, including pharmaceutical service. Satisfaction can be conceptualized as a performance evaluation, disconfirmation of expectations, an affect-based assessment, or an equity- based assessment. A satisfaction measure should have a theoretical base on which the measure's validity can be assessed. The measure chosen must fit the context of an overall research process, and the researcher must have a clear idea of what is to be measured. A large pool of items, or questions, for potential inclusion in a patient-satisfaction questionnaire can then be generated. The researcher should develop a format for each item (e.g., Likert scale). The items should be reviewed by experts for relevance and completeness. Questions that will help validate other questions should be included. To assess reliability and validity, the questionnaire should be given to a representative seropie of respondents before being refined into its final format. Finally, the researcher must ensure that the patient- satisfaction questionnaire is practical (e.g., in terms of length and complexity). No single standard measure of patient satisfaction is applicable to all pharmacy situations. Researchers should elther use an existing measure with demonstrated reliability and validity or develop a new measure by using a systematic process.
AB - Common conceptualizations of satisfaction are discussed, and different ways of measuring patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services are suggested. Patient satisfaction is becoming increasingly popular as an indicator of the quality of health care service, including pharmaceutical service. Satisfaction can be conceptualized as a performance evaluation, disconfirmation of expectations, an affect-based assessment, or an equity- based assessment. A satisfaction measure should have a theoretical base on which the measure's validity can be assessed. The measure chosen must fit the context of an overall research process, and the researcher must have a clear idea of what is to be measured. A large pool of items, or questions, for potential inclusion in a patient-satisfaction questionnaire can then be generated. The researcher should develop a format for each item (e.g., Likert scale). The items should be reviewed by experts for relevance and completeness. Questions that will help validate other questions should be included. To assess reliability and validity, the questionnaire should be given to a representative seropie of respondents before being refined into its final format. Finally, the researcher must ensure that the patient- satisfaction questionnaire is practical (e.g., in terms of length and complexity). No single standard measure of patient satisfaction is applicable to all pharmacy situations. Researchers should elther use an existing measure with demonstrated reliability and validity or develop a new measure by using a systematic process.
KW - Administration
KW - Methodology
KW - Patients
KW - Phar macy, Institutional, hospital
KW - Pharmacy, community
KW - Quality assurance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030844167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030844167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Review article
C2 - 9408519
AN - SCOPUS:0030844167
SN - 1079-2082
VL - 54
SP - 2721
EP - 2732
JO - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
JF - American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
IS - 23
ER -