Master Gardener's confidence and use of integrated pest management

Mary H. Meyer, Rhoda Burrows, Karen Jeannette, Celeste Welty, Aaron R. Boyson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


The North Central Consumer Horticulture Working Group developed and distributed a 14-question survey to determine the confidence of north-central U.S. extension Master Gardeners (MGs) in making integrated pest management (IPM) recommendations and their use of IPM. The online survey was completed by 3842 MGs in Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. MGs indicated they personally engaged in a range of IPM practices, including prevention, monitoring, cultural, and chemical controls. However, 81% indicated a need for more training in identifying diseases, and 65% say they needed more training in identifying insects. Only 16% indicated they had received advanced pest management training within the past 5 years. These MGs had higher mean scores for confidence, as well as prevention, monitoring, and cultural control and chemical awareness/control practices than those not participating in advanced training. Years of experience as an active MG and confidence in using IPM-related garden activities were correlated positively (r = 0.261). MGs with advanced pest management training were more confident in making IPM recommendations to other gardeners and were much more likely to use IPM practices than MG without advanced training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)812-816
Number of pages5
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 2010


  • Education
  • Extension
  • Pesticide
  • Teaching


Dive into the research topics of 'Master Gardener's confidence and use of integrated pest management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this