Mapping quantitative trait loci for a common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ideotype

Aaron D. Beattie, Jamie Larsen, Tom E. Michaels, K. Peter Pauls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Breeding a model plant that encompasses individual traits thought to enhance yield potential, known as ideotype breeding, has traditionally focused on phenotypic selection of plants with desirable morphological traits. Broadening this breeding method to the molecular level through the use of molecular markers would avoid the environmental interactions associated with phenotypic selection. A population of 110 F5 recombinant inbred lines (RILs), derived from the cross between WO3391 and 'OAC Speedvale', was used to develop a genetic linkage map consisting of 105 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), simple sequence repeat (SSR), and sequence-tagged site (STS) markers. The map has a total length of 641 cM distributed across 8 linkage groups (LGs). Five of them were aligned on the core linkage map of bean. Twenty-one quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were identified over three environments for eight agronomic and architectural traits previously defined for a bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ideotype. The QTLs were mapped to seven LGs with several regions containing QTLs for multiple traits. At least one QTL was located for each trait and a maximum of four were associated with lodging. Total explained phenotypic variance ranged from 10.6% for hypocotyl diameter to 45.4% for maturity. Some of the QTLs identified will be useful for early generation selection of tall, upright, high-yielding lines in a breeding program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)411-422
Number of pages12
JournalGenome
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2003

Keywords

  • Genetic map
  • Molecular markers
  • Plant architecture
  • Yield

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping quantitative trait loci for a common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ideotype'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this