Mapping common psychiatric disorders: Structure and predictive validity in the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions

Carlos Blanco, Robert F. Krueger, Deborah S. Hasin, Shang Min Liu, Shuai Wang, Bradley T. Kerridge, Tulshi Saha, Mark Olfson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: Clinical experience and factor analytic studies suggest that some psychiatric disorders may be more closely related to one another, as indicated by the frequency of their co-occurrence, which may have etiologic and treatment implications. Objective: To construct a virtual space of common psychiatric disorders, spanned by factors reflecting major psychopathologic dimensions, and locate psychiatric disorders in that space, as well as to examine whether the location of disorders at baseline predicts the prevalence and incidence of disorders at 3-year follow-up. Design, Setting, and Patients: A total of 34 653 individuals participated in waves 1 and 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Main Outcome Measures: The distance between disorders at wave 1, calculated using the loadings of the factors spanning the space of disorders as coordinates. This distance was correlated with the adjusted odds ratios for age, sex, and race/ethnicity of the prevalence and incidence of Axis I disorders in wave 2, with the aim of determining whether smaller distances between disorders at wave 1 predicts higher disorder prevalence and incidence at wave 2. Results: A model with 3 correlated factors provided an excellent fit (Comparative Fit Index = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.98, root mean square error of approximation =0.008) for the structure of common psychiatric disorders and was used to span the space of disorders. Distances ranged from 0.070 (between drug abuse and dysthymia) to 1.032 (between drug abuse and avoidant personality disorder). The correlation of distance between disorders in wave 1 with adjusted odds ratios of prevalence in wave 2 was ⋯ 0.56. The correlation of distance in wave 1 with adjusted odds ratios of incidence in wave 2 was ⋯ 0.57. Conclusions: Mapping psychiatric disorders can be used to quantify the distances among disorders. Proximity in turn can be used to predict prospectively the incidence and prevalence of Axis I disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-208
Number of pages10
JournalJAMA psychiatry
Volume70
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping common psychiatric disorders: Structure and predictive validity in the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this