Abstract
We theorize as to why conservative (liberal) managers may have higher (lower) rates of gender inequality in the training, promotion, and turnover of their subordinates, relative to moderate managers. Using novel microdata from the legal services industry, we find support for the majority of our arguments.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2016 |
| Publisher | Academy of Management |
| Pages | 1591-1596 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2016 |
| Event | 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2016 - Anaheim, United States Duration: Aug 5 2016 → Aug 9 2016 |
Other
| Other | 76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2016 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Anaheim |
| Period | 8/5/16 → 8/9/16 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Managers' political ideology and gender inequality within organizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS