Abstract
In this commentary, a longtime admirer of Cousins and Whitmore discusses why their 1998 article on participatory evaluation made an important contribution to the field. This chapter posits two principal streams of participatory evaluation, practical participatory evaluation and transformative participatory evaluation, and compares them on a set of dimensions relating to control, level, and range of participation. The authors then situate them among other forms of collaborative evaluations.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 83-105 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | New Directions for Evaluation |
| Volume | 2007 |
| Issue number | 114 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Making sense of participatory evaluation: Framing participatory evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS