Lung Cancer Messages on Twitter

Content Analysis and Evaluation

Jeannette Sutton, Sarah C. Vos, Michele K. Olson, Chelsea Woods, Elisia L Cohen, C. Ben Gibson, Nolan Edward Phillips, Jamie L. Studts, Jan M. Eberth, Carter T. Butts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this project was to describe and evaluate the levels of lung cancer communication across the cancer prevention and control continuum for content posted to Twitter during a 10-day period (September 30 to October 9) in 2016. Methods: Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to identify relationships between tweet characteristics in lung cancer communication on Twitter and user-level data. Overall, 3,000 tweets published between September 30 and October 9 were assessed by a team of three coders. Lung cancer–specific tweets by user type (individuals, media, and organizations) were examined to identify content and structural message features. The study also assessed differences by user type in the use of hashtags, directed messages, health topic focus, and lung cancer–specific focus across the cancer control continuum. Results: Across the universe of lung cancer tweets, the majority of tweets focused on treatment and the use of pharmaceutical and research interventions, followed by awareness and prevention and risk topics. Among all lung cancer tweets, messages were most consistently tweeted by individual users, and personal behavioral mobilizing cues to action were rare. Conclusions: Lung cancer advocates, as well as patient and medical advocacy organizations, with an interest in expanding the reach and effectiveness of social media efforts should monitor the topical nature of public tweets across the cancer continuum and consider integrating cues to action as a strategy to increase engagement and behavioral activation pertaining to lung cancer reduction efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-217
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Lung Neoplasms
Cues
Communication
Organizations
Social Media
Patient Advocacy
Neoplasms
Lung
Health

Keywords

  • Social media
  • Twitter messaging
  • content analysis
  • lung cancer

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Cite this

Lung Cancer Messages on Twitter : Content Analysis and Evaluation. / Sutton, Jeannette; Vos, Sarah C.; Olson, Michele K.; Woods, Chelsea; Cohen, Elisia L; Gibson, C. Ben; Phillips, Nolan Edward; Studts, Jamie L.; Eberth, Jan M.; Butts, Carter T.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 210-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sutton, J, Vos, SC, Olson, MK, Woods, C, Cohen, EL, Gibson, CB, Phillips, NE, Studts, JL, Eberth, JM & Butts, CT 2018, 'Lung Cancer Messages on Twitter: Content Analysis and Evaluation', Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.043
Sutton, Jeannette ; Vos, Sarah C. ; Olson, Michele K. ; Woods, Chelsea ; Cohen, Elisia L ; Gibson, C. Ben ; Phillips, Nolan Edward ; Studts, Jamie L. ; Eberth, Jan M. ; Butts, Carter T. / Lung Cancer Messages on Twitter : Content Analysis and Evaluation. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 210-217.
@article{541dd2423d964795ad315409624499cd,
title = "Lung Cancer Messages on Twitter: Content Analysis and Evaluation",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this project was to describe and evaluate the levels of lung cancer communication across the cancer prevention and control continuum for content posted to Twitter during a 10-day period (September 30 to October 9) in 2016. Methods: Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to identify relationships between tweet characteristics in lung cancer communication on Twitter and user-level data. Overall, 3,000 tweets published between September 30 and October 9 were assessed by a team of three coders. Lung cancer–specific tweets by user type (individuals, media, and organizations) were examined to identify content and structural message features. The study also assessed differences by user type in the use of hashtags, directed messages, health topic focus, and lung cancer–specific focus across the cancer control continuum. Results: Across the universe of lung cancer tweets, the majority of tweets focused on treatment and the use of pharmaceutical and research interventions, followed by awareness and prevention and risk topics. Among all lung cancer tweets, messages were most consistently tweeted by individual users, and personal behavioral mobilizing cues to action were rare. Conclusions: Lung cancer advocates, as well as patient and medical advocacy organizations, with an interest in expanding the reach and effectiveness of social media efforts should monitor the topical nature of public tweets across the cancer continuum and consider integrating cues to action as a strategy to increase engagement and behavioral activation pertaining to lung cancer reduction efforts.",
keywords = "Social media, Twitter messaging, content analysis, lung cancer",
author = "Jeannette Sutton and Vos, {Sarah C.} and Olson, {Michele K.} and Chelsea Woods and Cohen, {Elisia L} and Gibson, {C. Ben} and Phillips, {Nolan Edward} and Studts, {Jamie L.} and Eberth, {Jan M.} and Butts, {Carter T.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "210--217",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lung Cancer Messages on Twitter

T2 - Content Analysis and Evaluation

AU - Sutton, Jeannette

AU - Vos, Sarah C.

AU - Olson, Michele K.

AU - Woods, Chelsea

AU - Cohen, Elisia L

AU - Gibson, C. Ben

AU - Phillips, Nolan Edward

AU - Studts, Jamie L.

AU - Eberth, Jan M.

AU - Butts, Carter T.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this project was to describe and evaluate the levels of lung cancer communication across the cancer prevention and control continuum for content posted to Twitter during a 10-day period (September 30 to October 9) in 2016. Methods: Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to identify relationships between tweet characteristics in lung cancer communication on Twitter and user-level data. Overall, 3,000 tweets published between September 30 and October 9 were assessed by a team of three coders. Lung cancer–specific tweets by user type (individuals, media, and organizations) were examined to identify content and structural message features. The study also assessed differences by user type in the use of hashtags, directed messages, health topic focus, and lung cancer–specific focus across the cancer control continuum. Results: Across the universe of lung cancer tweets, the majority of tweets focused on treatment and the use of pharmaceutical and research interventions, followed by awareness and prevention and risk topics. Among all lung cancer tweets, messages were most consistently tweeted by individual users, and personal behavioral mobilizing cues to action were rare. Conclusions: Lung cancer advocates, as well as patient and medical advocacy organizations, with an interest in expanding the reach and effectiveness of social media efforts should monitor the topical nature of public tweets across the cancer continuum and consider integrating cues to action as a strategy to increase engagement and behavioral activation pertaining to lung cancer reduction efforts.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this project was to describe and evaluate the levels of lung cancer communication across the cancer prevention and control continuum for content posted to Twitter during a 10-day period (September 30 to October 9) in 2016. Methods: Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to identify relationships between tweet characteristics in lung cancer communication on Twitter and user-level data. Overall, 3,000 tweets published between September 30 and October 9 were assessed by a team of three coders. Lung cancer–specific tweets by user type (individuals, media, and organizations) were examined to identify content and structural message features. The study also assessed differences by user type in the use of hashtags, directed messages, health topic focus, and lung cancer–specific focus across the cancer control continuum. Results: Across the universe of lung cancer tweets, the majority of tweets focused on treatment and the use of pharmaceutical and research interventions, followed by awareness and prevention and risk topics. Among all lung cancer tweets, messages were most consistently tweeted by individual users, and personal behavioral mobilizing cues to action were rare. Conclusions: Lung cancer advocates, as well as patient and medical advocacy organizations, with an interest in expanding the reach and effectiveness of social media efforts should monitor the topical nature of public tweets across the cancer continuum and consider integrating cues to action as a strategy to increase engagement and behavioral activation pertaining to lung cancer reduction efforts.

KW - Social media

KW - Twitter messaging

KW - content analysis

KW - lung cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033804685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033804685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.043

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.043

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 210

EP - 217

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 1

ER -