Abstract
Mixtures of cool-season grasses and flowers marketed under the names 'Ecology Lawn Mix' and 'Fleur de Lawn'; and 'No Mow', a mixture of fine fescues, performed as well as conventional, low maintenance, cool-season grasses when rated for color, cover and overall appearance in three years of trials at two locations in Minnesota. Materials were evaluated using no pesticides or irrigation, with 2″, 4″ and minimum (2/yr) mowing treatments and three fertility levels. Mixtures containing perennial ryegrass provided the best cover with minimal weed competition. Warm-season grasses and mixtures of forbs without cool-season grasses had significantly lower color and cover ratings. This research provides more choices for homeowners and commercial grounds personnel looking for acceptable, alternative turfgrasses with minimal inputs.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 49-57 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Turfgrass Management |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - Dec 1 1999 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Lawn care
- Sustainable turfgrass
Cite this
Low maintenance alternative turf trials. / Meyer, Mary H; Pedersen, B.
In: Journal of Turfgrass Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.12.1999, p. 49-57.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Low maintenance alternative turf trials
AU - Meyer, Mary H
AU - Pedersen, B.
PY - 1999/12/1
Y1 - 1999/12/1
N2 - Mixtures of cool-season grasses and flowers marketed under the names 'Ecology Lawn Mix' and 'Fleur de Lawn'; and 'No Mow', a mixture of fine fescues, performed as well as conventional, low maintenance, cool-season grasses when rated for color, cover and overall appearance in three years of trials at two locations in Minnesota. Materials were evaluated using no pesticides or irrigation, with 2″, 4″ and minimum (2/yr) mowing treatments and three fertility levels. Mixtures containing perennial ryegrass provided the best cover with minimal weed competition. Warm-season grasses and mixtures of forbs without cool-season grasses had significantly lower color and cover ratings. This research provides more choices for homeowners and commercial grounds personnel looking for acceptable, alternative turfgrasses with minimal inputs.
AB - Mixtures of cool-season grasses and flowers marketed under the names 'Ecology Lawn Mix' and 'Fleur de Lawn'; and 'No Mow', a mixture of fine fescues, performed as well as conventional, low maintenance, cool-season grasses when rated for color, cover and overall appearance in three years of trials at two locations in Minnesota. Materials were evaluated using no pesticides or irrigation, with 2″, 4″ and minimum (2/yr) mowing treatments and three fertility levels. Mixtures containing perennial ryegrass provided the best cover with minimal weed competition. Warm-season grasses and mixtures of forbs without cool-season grasses had significantly lower color and cover ratings. This research provides more choices for homeowners and commercial grounds personnel looking for acceptable, alternative turfgrasses with minimal inputs.
KW - Lawn care
KW - Sustainable turfgrass
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033508782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033508782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033508782
VL - 3
SP - 49
EP - 57
JO - Journal of Turfgrass Management
JF - Journal of Turfgrass Management
SN - 1070-437X
IS - 2
ER -