Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of volumetric muscle loss

  • Daniel B. Hoffman
  • , Albino G. Schifino
  • , Marion A. Cooley
  • , Roger X. Zhong
  • , Junwon Heo
  • , Courtney M. Morris
  • , Matthew J. Campbell
  • , Gordon L. Warren
  • , Sarah M. Greising
  • , Jarrod A. Call

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study's objective was to investigate the extent to which two different levels of low-intensity vibration training (0.6 g or 1.0 g) affected musculoskeletal structure and function after a volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury in male C57BL/6J mice. All mice received a unilateral VML injury to the posterior plantar flexors. Mice were randomized into a control group (no vibration; VML-noTX), or one of two experimental groups. The two experimental groups received vibration training for 15-min/day, 5-days/week for 8 weeks at either 0.6 g (VML-0.6 g) or 1.0 g (VML-1.0 g) beginning 3-days after induction of VML. Muscles were analyzed for contractile and metabolic adaptations. Tibial bone mechanical properties and geometric structure were assessed by a three-point bending test and microcomputed tomography (µCT). Body mass-normalized peak isometric-torque was 18% less in VML-0.6 g mice compared with VML-noTx mice (p = 0.030). There were no statistically significant differences of vibration intervention on contractile power or muscle oxygen consumption (p ≥ 0.191). Bone ultimate load, but not stiffness, was ~16% greater in tibias of VML-1.0 g mice compared with those from VML-noTx mice (p = 0.048). Cortical bone volume was ~12% greater in tibias of both vibration groups compared with VML-noTx mice (p = 0.003). Importantly, cross-section moment of inertia, the primary determinant of bone ultimate load, was 44% larger in tibias of VML-0.6 g mice compared with VML-noTx mice (p = 0.006). These changes indicate that following VML, bones are more responsive to the selected vibration training parameters than muscle. Vibration training represents a possible adjuvant intervention to address bone deficits following VML.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)622-631
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Research
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.

Keywords

  • bone weakness
  • mitochondria
  • muscle injury
  • rehabilitation

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Low intensity, high frequency vibration training to improve musculoskeletal function in a mouse model of volumetric muscle loss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this