Longitudinal process of employee well-being: Cross-lagged relationships among domain satisfactions and subjective well-being

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Scholars have become increasingly interested in employees' well-being. Despite studies on the relationships among well-being constructs, research gaps still exist from the longitudinal and within-person perspectives. Based on top-down and bottom-up theories of subjective well-being and spillover theories, this study examines the longitudinal relationships of work satisfaction, nonwork satisfaction, and subjective well-being. A random intercept cross-lagged panel model was used with the data of four yearly waves collected from 8624 full-time employees. The autoregressive and cross-lagged coefficients were not stable but rather change across time. There were strong between-person correlations between work satisfaction, nonwork satisfaction, and subjective well-being. At the within-person level, the paths from subjective well-being to work satisfaction were not significant while the paths from subjective well-being to nonwork satisfaction were significant over the years. The cross-lagged effects from work satisfaction and nonwork satisfaction to subjective well-being were not significant across the years. However, the cross-lagged relationships between work satisfaction and nonwork satisfaction were significant. Theoretical implications, practical implications, and suggestions for future research were discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHuman Resource Development Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Human Resource Development Quarterly published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

  • cross-lagged model
  • employee well-being
  • nonwork satisfaction
  • RI-CLPM
  • subjective well-being
  • work satisfaction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Longitudinal process of employee well-being: Cross-lagged relationships among domain satisfactions and subjective well-being'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this